Comparative Assessment of Particulate Air Pollution Exposure from Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator Emissions

被引:18
作者
Ashworth, Danielle C. [1 ]
Fuller, Gary W. [2 ]
Toledano, Mireille B. [1 ]
Font, Anna [2 ]
Elliott, Paul [3 ]
Hansell, Anna L. [3 ]
de Hoogh, Kees [3 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Fac Med, MRC PHE Ctr Environm & Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, London W2 1PG, England
[2] Kings Coll London, MRC PHE Ctr Environm & Hlth, London WC2R 2LS, England
[3] Imperial Coll London, Fac Med, MRC PHE Ctr Environm & Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat,Small Area Hlth Stat Uni, St Marys Campus,Norfolk Pl, London W2 1PG, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1155/2013/560342
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. Research to date on health effects associated with incineration has found limited evidence of health risks, but many previous studies have been constrained by poor exposure assessment. This paper provides a comparative assessment of atmospheric dispersion modelling and distance from source (a commonly used proxy for exposure) as exposure assessment methods for pollutants released from incinerators. Methods. Distance from source and the atmospheric dispersion model ADMS-Urban were used to characterise ambient exposures to particulates from two municipal solid waste incinerators (MSWIs) in the UK. Additionally an exploration of the sensitivity of the dispersion model simulations to input parameters was performed. Results. The model output indicated extremely low ground level concentrations of PM 10, with maximum concentrations of <0.01 mu g/m(3). Proximity and modelled PM 10 concentrations for both MSWIs at postcode level were highly correlated when using continuous measures (Spearman correlation coefficients similar to 0.7) but showed poor agreement for categorical measures (deciles or quintiles, Cohen's kappa coefficients <= 0.5). Conclusion. To provide the most appropriate estimate of ambient exposure from MSWIs, it is essential that incinerator characteristics, magnitude of emissions, and surrounding meteorological and topographical conditions are considered. Reducing exposure misclassification is particularly important in environmental epidemiology to aid detection of low-level risks.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
AEROMOD Implementation Workgroup. US Environmnetal Protection Agency, 2009, AEROMOD IMPL GUID
[2]   Effect of measurement error on epidemiological studies of environmental and occupational exposures [J].
Armstrong, BG .
OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1998, 55 (10) :651-656
[3]  
Baker DB., 2008, ENV EPIDEMIOLOGY STU
[4]   Using geographic information systems to assess individual historical exposure to air pollution from traffic and house heating in Stockholm [J].
Bellander, T ;
Berglind, N ;
Gustavsson, P ;
Jonson, T ;
Nyberg, F ;
Pershagen, G ;
Järup, L .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2001, 109 (06) :633-639
[5]  
Bettinson N., 2012, AIR QUALITY MODELLIN
[6]  
BRIGGS D, 2000, SPATIAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
[7]  
Cambridge Environmental Research Consultants Ltd, 2010, ADMS URB URB AIR QUA
[8]   UK-ADMS - A NEW APPROACH TO MODELING DISPERSION IN THE EARTHS ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY-LAYER [J].
CARRUTHERS, DJ ;
HOLROY, DRJ ;
HUNT, JCR ;
WENG, WS ;
ROBINS, AG ;
APSLEY, DD ;
THOMSON, DJ ;
SMITH, FB .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 1994, 52 (1-3) :139-153
[9]   Use and validation of ADMS-Urban in contrasting urban and industrial locations [J].
Carruthers, DJ ;
Edmunds, HA ;
Lester, AE ;
McHugh, CA ;
Singles, RJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION, 2000, 14 (1-6) :364-374