Differences in the usefulness of communication channels, as experienced by gender and ethnic groups during their university selection process

被引:1
作者
Wiese, M. [1 ]
Jordaan, Y. [1 ]
van Heerden, C. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pretoria, Fac Econ & Management Sci, Dept Mkt & Commun Management, Pretoria, South Africa
来源
COMMUNICATIO-SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL FOR COMMUNICATION THEORY AND RESEARCH | 2010年 / 36卷 / 01期
关键词
Communication channels; ethnic group; gender; higher education; selection process; students;
D O I
10.1080/02500160903525064
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Recruiting students to enrol at a particular institution is becoming a competitive and challenging process for higher education institutions. Therefore, institutions should create efficient and effective ways of providing relevant information to prospective students during their process of selecting an institution. The major communication channels that prospective students consult during their selection process, and the usefulness thereof for students, are important knowledge imperatives for higher education institutions. In this study, 12 different channels of communication, considered by students during a typical higher education institution selection process, were investigated. A non-probability convenience sample of 1 241 first-year students from six higher education institutions in South Africa was drawn. Findings suggest that female students attach a significantly higher value to nine of the 12 communication channels, compared to their male counterparts. There were also differences between the ethnic groups in terms of the usefulness of events on campus, high school teachers, open days and campus visits, as well as university publications. Higher education institutions can use the results to develop communication strategies that are more student oriented, in order to reinforce their image and to reach students more effectively through the appropriate communication channels.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 129
页数:18
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Anisimova TA, 2007, J CONSUM MARK, V24, P395, DOI 10.1108/07363760710834816
[2]  
Arpan L. M., 2003, CORP COMMUN, V8, P97, DOI [10.1108/1356328031047535, DOI 10.1108/1356328031047535]
[3]   Information and source preferences of a student market in higher education [J].
Bonnema, J. ;
Van der Waldt, D. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 22 (04) :314-+
[4]  
Bradshaw G.S., 2001, COLL U, V77, P15
[5]   A MODEL OF STUDENT COLLEGE CHOICE [J].
CHAPMAN, DW .
JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 1981, 52 (05) :490-505
[6]   The organisation of integrated communications: toward flexible integration [J].
Christensen, Lars Thoger ;
Firat, A. Fuat ;
Torp, Simon .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2008, 42 (3-4) :423-452
[7]  
DUPLESSIS PJ, 2005, BUYER BEHAV MULTICUL
[8]  
Espinoza S., 2002, COLL U, V77, P19
[9]  
Goff B., 2004, COMMUNITY COLL J RES, V28, P795, DOI DOI 10.1080/10668920390276957
[10]  
Hair J.F., 2006, MULTIVARIANT DATA AN