Impressions in action: the socially situated construction of expertise in the workplace

被引:7
作者
Johri, Aditya [1 ]
机构
[1] George Mason Univ, Volgenau Sch Engn, Dept Appl Informat Technol, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Frames; Impression formation; Situated practices; Workplace expertise;
D O I
10.1108/JOE-04-2014-0008
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The impressions of others' expertise are fundamental to workplace dynamics. Identifying expertise is essential for workplace functions such as task assignment, task completion, and knowledge generation. Although prior work has examined both the nature of expertise and its importance for work, formation of expertise impressions in the workplace has not received much attention. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach - In this paper the author addresses the question - how do we form expertise impressions in the workplace - using data from an ethnographic study of a workplace setting. The author employs a case study of project team formation to synthesize a process framework of impression formation. Findings - The author proposes a framework that integrates sociocultural and interactional accounts to argue that actors utilize situational and institutional frames to socially construct their expertise impressions of others. These frames emerge as actors engage in activities within a community of practice. Originality/value - This practice-based explication of expertise construction moves beyond narrow conceptions of personality-based traits or credentials as signals of expertise. It explains why sharing of expertise within organizations through the use of information technology continues to be problematic expertise is an enactment and therefore it defies reification through knowledge management.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 63
页数:20
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Agnew N. M., 1997, EXPERTISE CONTEXT HU, P219
  • [2] Angrosino M. V., 2003, COLLECTING INTERPRET, P107
  • [3] Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution
    Barley, SR
    Tolbert, PS
    [J]. ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 1997, 18 (01) : 93 - 117
  • [4] Berger C. R., 1982, LANGUAGE SOCIAL KNOW
  • [5] Berger C.R., 1978, COMMUNICATION YB, V2, P171
  • [6] Bourdieu P., 1977, OUTLINE THEORY PRACT, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511812507
  • [7] Brown J.S., 1989, ED RES, V18, P32, DOI [10.3102/0013189X018001032, DOI 10.3102/0013189X018001032]
  • [8] Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective
    Brown, JS
    Duguid, P
    [J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2001, 12 (02) : 198 - 213
  • [9] Clancey W.J., 1997, EXPERTISE CONTEXT HU, P249
  • [10] The iron cage revisited - Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (Reprinted from the American Sociological Association vol 48, pg 147-160, 1983)
    DiMaggio, PJ
    Powell, WW
    [J]. ADVANCES IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, VOL 17, 2000: ECONOMICS MEETS SOCIOLOGY IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2000, 17 : 143 - 166