Experience With Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy at a Secondary Training Hospital: Operation Time, Treatment Outcomes, and Complications With the Accumulation of Experience

被引:11
|
作者
Seo, Do Young [1 ]
Cho, Hee Ju [1 ]
Cho, Jeong Man [1 ]
Kang, Jung Yoon [1 ]
Yoo, Tag Keun [1 ]
机构
[1] Eulji Univ, Eulji Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Urol, 68 Hangeulbiseok Ro, Seoul 139711, South Korea
关键词
Learning curve; Prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasms; Robotics;
D O I
10.4111/kju.2013.54.8.522
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the learning curve and outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) performed by a relatively lower volume surgeon at a secondary training hospital. Materials and Methods: The medical records and the surgery video recordings of 100 patients who underwent RALP by a single surgeon between March 2010 and January 2013 were reviewed. The first 10 cases were grouped into period 1, cases 11 to 40 into period 2, cases 41 to 70 into period 3, and cases 71 to 100 into period 4. The interval between the operations, the operative time for each step of the surgery, the total console time, and the operative outcomes were investigated. Results: The mean interval between surgeries was 10.6 +/- 9.3 days. The console time decreased progressively after the first 10 cases and reached under 3 hours after 75 cases. The time taken to begin dissection of the dorsal vein complex, for the division of the bladder neck, for lateral dissection with neurovascular bundle preservation, and for apex dissection decreased significantly with experience, although the time for vesicourethral anastomosis did not. The margin-positive rate of stage T2 patients was 27.4% (20/73), and the transfusion rate was 50% in period 1 patients and 3.3% in period 4 patients. No major complications occurred. Conclusions: It is difficult to shorten the learning curve of surgeons in secondary training hospitals owing to the smaller number of cases and the irregular surgical intervals. Although the operation time was relatively longer, the surgical outcome and complication rates were comparable with those of surgeons at larger hospitals.
引用
收藏
页码:522 / 526
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Climacturia after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Parra Lopez, Maria Loreto
    Lozano Blasco, Jose Maria
    Osman Garcia, Ignacio
    Congregado Ruiz, Belen
    Conde Sanchez, Jose Manuel
    Medina Lopez, Rafael Antonio
    REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE ANDROLOGIA, 2021, 19 (01): : 49 - 52
  • [42] Changes in pathologic outcomes and operative trends with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Bernie, Aaron
    Ramasamy, Ranjith
    Ali, Adnan
    Tewari, Ashutosh K.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 30 (04) : 378 - 382
  • [43] Standardized analysis of complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: Korea University Hospital experience
    Pyun, Jong Hyun
    Kim, Hyung Keun
    Kim, Jae Yoon
    Kim, Seung Bin
    Cho, Seok
    Kang, Sung Gu
    Ko, Young Hwii
    Cheon, Jun
    Lee, Jeong Gu
    Kim, Je Jong
    Kang, Seok Ho
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 56 (01) : 48 - 55
  • [44] Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Cumulative Analysis of Comparative Studies
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    Novara, Giacomo
    Artibani, Walter
    Cestari, Andrea
    Galfano, Antonio
    Graefen, Markus
    Guazzoni, Giorgio
    Guillonneau, Bertrand
    Menon, Mani
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Patel, Vipul
    Rassweiler, Jens
    Van Poppel, Hendrik
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (05) : 1037 - 1063
  • [45] Single-port robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial experience and technique with the da Vinci® SP platform
    Dobbs, Ryan W.
    Halgrimson, Whitney R.
    Madueke, Ikenna
    Vigneswaran, Hari T.
    Wilson, Jessica O.
    Crivellaro, Simone
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 124 (06) : 1022 - 1027
  • [46] Comparison of functional outcomes between laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched comparison study
    Ku, Ja Yoon
    Lee, Chan Ho
    Lee, Jeong Zoo
    Ha, Hong Koo
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 13 (03) : 212 - 218
  • [47] Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Four cases
    Lee, Yong Scong
    Han, Woong Kyu
    Oh, Young Taik
    Choi, Young Deuk
    Yang, Seung Choul
    Rha, Koon Ho
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 48 (02) : 341 - 346
  • [48] Prevention of complications of general anesthesia linked with laparoscopic access and with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Chatti, C.
    Corsia, G.
    Yates, D. -R.
    Vaessen, C.
    Bitker, M. -O
    Coriat, P.
    Roupret, M.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2011, 21 (12): : 829 - 834
  • [49] Perioperative Complications after Radical Prostatectomy: Open versus Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Approach
    Froehner, Michael
    Novotny, Vladimir
    Koch, Rainer
    Leike, Steffen
    Twelker, Lars
    Wirth, Manfred P.
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2013, 90 (03) : 312 - 315
  • [50] Predictors of prolonged operative time during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Yong, Daniel Z.
    Tsivian, Matvey
    Zilberman, Dorit E.
    Ferrandino, Michael N.
    Mouraviev, Vladimir
    Albala, David M.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 107 (02) : 280 - 282