Experience With Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy at a Secondary Training Hospital: Operation Time, Treatment Outcomes, and Complications With the Accumulation of Experience

被引:11
|
作者
Seo, Do Young [1 ]
Cho, Hee Ju [1 ]
Cho, Jeong Man [1 ]
Kang, Jung Yoon [1 ]
Yoo, Tag Keun [1 ]
机构
[1] Eulji Univ, Eulji Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Urol, 68 Hangeulbiseok Ro, Seoul 139711, South Korea
关键词
Learning curve; Prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasms; Robotics;
D O I
10.4111/kju.2013.54.8.522
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the learning curve and outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) performed by a relatively lower volume surgeon at a secondary training hospital. Materials and Methods: The medical records and the surgery video recordings of 100 patients who underwent RALP by a single surgeon between March 2010 and January 2013 were reviewed. The first 10 cases were grouped into period 1, cases 11 to 40 into period 2, cases 41 to 70 into period 3, and cases 71 to 100 into period 4. The interval between the operations, the operative time for each step of the surgery, the total console time, and the operative outcomes were investigated. Results: The mean interval between surgeries was 10.6 +/- 9.3 days. The console time decreased progressively after the first 10 cases and reached under 3 hours after 75 cases. The time taken to begin dissection of the dorsal vein complex, for the division of the bladder neck, for lateral dissection with neurovascular bundle preservation, and for apex dissection decreased significantly with experience, although the time for vesicourethral anastomosis did not. The margin-positive rate of stage T2 patients was 27.4% (20/73), and the transfusion rate was 50% in period 1 patients and 3.3% in period 4 patients. No major complications occurred. Conclusions: It is difficult to shorten the learning curve of surgeons in secondary training hospitals owing to the smaller number of cases and the irregular surgical intervals. Although the operation time was relatively longer, the surgical outcome and complication rates were comparable with those of surgeons at larger hospitals.
引用
收藏
页码:522 / 526
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Predictors of operative time during radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
    Simon, Ross M.
    Howard, Lauren E.
    Moreira, Daniel M.
    Terris, Martha K.
    Kane, Christopher J.
    Aronson, William J.
    Amling, Christopher L.
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Freedland, Stephen J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 (08) : 618 - 623
  • [32] Pentafecta outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: First 100 cases in Latinoamerican Hospital
    Garate, J.
    Sanchez-Salas, R.
    Valero, R.
    Matheus, R.
    Leon, A.
    Davila, H.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2015, 39 (01): : 20 - 25
  • [33] Extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-center experience beyond the learning curve
    Guillaume Ploussard
    Laurent Salomon
    Bastien Parier
    Claude Clément Abbou
    Alexandre de la Taille
    World Journal of Urology, 2013, 31 : 447 - 453
  • [34] Extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-center experience beyond the learning curve
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Salomon, Laurent
    Parier, Bastien
    Abbou, Claude Clement
    de la Taille, Alexandre
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 31 (03) : 447 - 453
  • [35] Robot-assisted extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience in a high-volume laparoscopy reference centre
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Xylinas, Evanguelos
    Salomon, Laurent
    Vordos, Dimitri
    Hoznek, Andras
    Abbou, Claude-Clement
    de la Taille, Alexandre
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 105 (08) : 1155 - 1160
  • [36] Does robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy enable to obtain adequate oncological and functional outcomes during the learning curve? From the Korean experience
    Ko, Young Hwii
    Ban, Jeong Hyeon
    Kang, Seok Ho
    Park, Hong Seok
    Lee, Jeong Gu
    Yoon, Duck Ki
    Kim, Je Jong
    Cheon, Jun
    Patel, Vipul R.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2009, 11 (02) : 167 - 175
  • [37] Does Previous Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Experience Affect Outcomes at Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy? Results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium
    Hayn, Matthew H.
    Hellenthal, Nicholas J.
    Hussain, Abid
    Andrews, Paul E.
    Carpentier, Paul
    Castle, Erik
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Davis, Rodney
    Thomas, Raju
    Khan, Shamim
    Kibel, Adam
    Kim, Hyung
    Manoharan, Murugesan
    Menon, Mani
    Mottrie, Alex
    Ornstein, David
    Peabody, James
    Pruthi, Raj
    Redorta, Joan Palou
    Vira, Manish
    Schanne, Francis
    Stricker, Hans
    Wiklund, Peter
    Wilding, Greg
    Guru, Khurshid A.
    UROLOGY, 2010, 76 (05) : 1111 - 1116
  • [38] Switching from laparoscopic radical prostatectomy to robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: comparing oncological outcomes and complications
    Johnson, Ida
    Ottosson, Fredrik
    Diep, Lien My
    Berg, Rolf Eigil
    Hoff, Jon-Roar
    Wessel, Nicolai
    Eri, Lars Magne
    Berge, Viktor
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 52 (02) : 116 - 121
  • [39] Intraoperative Registered Transrectal Ultrasound Guidance for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Mohareri, Omid
    Ischia, Joseph
    Black, Peter C.
    Schneider, Caitlin
    Lobo, Julio
    Goldenberg, Larry
    Salcudean, Septimiu E.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (01) : 302 - 312
  • [40] Technical advances in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Turpen, Ryan
    Atalah, Hany
    Su, Li-Ming
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2009, 1 (05) : 251 - 258