The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire - Stigma (AAQ-S): Developing a measure of psychological flexibility with stigmatizing thoughts

被引:50
作者
Levin, Michael E. [1 ,2 ]
Luoma, Jason B. [3 ]
Lillis, Jason [4 ]
Hayes, Steven C. [1 ]
Vilardaga, Roger [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Dept Psychol, MS-298,1664N Virginia St, Reno, NV 89557 USA
[2] Utah State Univ, Dept Psychol, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[3] Res & Training Ctr, Portland Psychotherapy Clin, Portland, OR 97212 USA
[4] Miriam Hosp, Brown Med Sch, Weight Control & Diabet Res Ctr, Providence, RI 02903 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
关键词
Psychological flexibility; Experiential avoidance; Stigma; Prejudice; Acceptance and Commitment Therapy;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcbs.2013.11.003
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The current study sought to develop and test the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire - Stigma (AAQ-S), a measure of psychological flexibility with stigmatizing thoughts. A sample of 604 undergraduate students completed an online survey, which included an initial pool of 43 AAQ-S items as well as measures related to psychological flexibility and stigma. Expert judge ratings and factor analysis were used to identify and refine two distinct subscales; psychological flexibility and psychological inflexibility relating to stigmatizing thoughts. Analyses indicated that the AAQ-S psychological flexibility and inflexibility subscales, as well as a combined total score, correlate with other measures of psychological flexibility and stigma in expected ways, and are more predictive of stigma than a general measure of psychological flexibility. Overall, the results suggest that the AAQ-S could be a useful measure in conducting future stigma research. (C) 2013 Association for Contextual Behavioral Science, Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 26
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Generalized Prejudice: Common and Specific Components [J].
Akrami, Nazar ;
Ekehammar, Bo ;
Bergh, Robin .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 22 (01) :57-59
[2]   Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation and the Dimensions of Generalized Prejudice: A Longitudinal Test [J].
Asbrock, Frank ;
Sibley, Chris G. ;
Duckitt, John .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2010, 24 (04) :324-340
[3]  
Backstrom M., 2007, J INDIVID DIFFER, V28, P10, DOI [DOI 10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.10, 10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.10]
[4]  
Bogardus ES, 1925, J APPL SOCIOL, V9, P216
[5]  
Bond FW, 2011, BEHAV THER, V42, P676, DOI 10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007
[6]   The theoretical status of latent variables [J].
Borsboom, D ;
Mellenbergh, GJ ;
van Heerden, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2003, 110 (02) :203-219
[7]   Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development [J].
Clark, LA ;
Watson, D .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1995, 7 (03) :309-319
[8]   WHAT IS COEFFICIENT ALPHA - AN EXAMINATION OF THEORY AND APPLICATIONS [J].
CORTINA, JM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 78 (01) :98-104
[9]   MEASURING INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN EMPATHY - EVIDENCE FOR A MULTIDIMENSIONAL APPROACH [J].
DAVIS, MH .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 44 (01) :113-126
[10]  
Davis MH, 1980, JSAS CATALOG SELECTE, V10, P85, DOI DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113