TRUNK MUSCLE ACTIVATION - THE EFFECTS OF TORSO FLEXION, MOMENT DIRECTION, AND MOMENT MAGNITUDE

被引:23
作者
LAVENDER, S
TRAFIMOW, J
ANDERSSON, GBJ
MAYER, RS
CHEN, IH
机构
[1] Departments of Orthopedic Surgery, Chicago, IL
[2] Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke’s Medical Center, Chicago, IL
[3] Department of Orthopedics, Tsu-Chi General Hospital, Taipei
关键词
Asymmetric loading; Coactivation; Electromyography; Ergonomics; Trunk flexion; Trunk muscles;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199404000-00008
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives. This study was performed to quantify the electromyographic trunk muscle activities in response to variations in moment magnitude and direction while in forward-flexed postures. Methods. Recordings were made over eight trunk muscles in 19 subjects who maintained forward-flexed postures of 30-degrees and 60-degrees. In each of the two flexed postures, external moments of 20 Nm and 40 Nm were applied via a chest harness. The moment directions were varied in seven 30-degrees increments to a subject's right side, such that the direction of the applied load ranged from the upper body's anterior midsagittal plane (0-degrees) to the posterior midsagittal plane (180-degrees). Results. Statistical analyses yielded significant moment magnitude by moment-direction interaction effects for the EMG output from six of the eight muscles. Trunk flexion by moment-direction interactions were observed in the responses from three muscles. Conclusions. In general, the primary muscle supporting the torso and the applied load was the contralateral (left) erector spinae. The level of electromyographic activity in the anterior muscles was quite low, even with the posterior moment directions.
引用
收藏
页码:771 / 778
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Andersson G., Ortengren R., Herberts P., Quantitative electromyographic studies of back muscle activity related to posture and loading, Orthop Clin North Am, 8, pp. 85-96, (1977)
[2]  
Bean J.C., Chaffin D.B., Schultz A.B., Biomechanical model calculation of muscle contraction forces: A double linear programming method, J Biomech, 21, pp. 59-66, (1988)
[3]  
Floyd W.F., Silver P., The function of the erectores spinae muscles in certain movements and postures in man, J Physiol, 129, pp. 184-203, (1955)
[4]  
Ladin Z., Murthy K.R., De Luca C.J., The effects of external bending moments on lumbar muscle force distribution, J Biomech Eng, 113, pp. 24-294, (1991)
[5]  
Ladin Z., Murthy K.R., De Luca C.J., Mechanical recruitment of low-back muscles: Theoretical predictions and experimental validation, Spine, 9, pp. 927-938, (1989)
[6]  
Lavender S.A., Tsuang Y.H., Ersson G., Hafezi A., Shin C.C., Trunk muscle cocontraction: The effects of moment direction and moment magnitude, J Orthop Res, 10, pp. 691-700, (1992)
[7]  
Marras W.S., Sommerich CM. A three-dimensional motion model of loads on the lumbar spine: I. Model structure, Hum Factors, 33, pp. 123-138, (1991)
[8]  
Marras W.S., Mirka G.A., A comprehensive evaluation of trunk response to asymmetric trunk motion, Spine, 17, pp. 318-326, (1992)
[9]  
Marras W.S., King Al, Joynt RL. Measurements of load on the lumbar spine under isometric and isokinetic conditions, Spine, 9, pp. 176-187, (1984)
[10]  
McGill S.M., Norman R.W., Partitioning of the L4-L5 dynamic moment into disc, ligamentous, and muscular components during lifting, Spine, 11, pp. 666-678, (1986)