TABLES OF X-RAY ABSORPTION CORRECTIONS AND DISPERSION CORRECTIONS - THE NEW VERSUS THE OLD

This paper compares the data on X-ray absorption coefficients calculated by Creagh and Hubbell and tabulated in International Tables for Crystallography, vol. C, ed. A.J.C. Wilson (1990) section 4.2.4 [1] with empirical (Saloman, Hubbell and Scofield, At. Data and Nucl. Data Tables 38 (1988) 1, [6]) and semi-empirical (Hubbell, McMaster, Kerr Del Grande and Mallett, in: International Tables for Crystallography, vol. IV, eds. Ibers and Hamilton (Kynoch, Birmingham, 1974) [2]) tabulations as well as the renormalized relativistic Dirac-Hartree-Fock calculations of Scofield [6]. It also makes comparisons of the real part of the dispersion correction f{hook}′(ω, 0) and tabulated in ref. [1], with theoretical data sets (Cromer and Liberman, J. Chem. Phys. 53 (1970) 1891, and Acta Crystallogr. A37 (1981) 267 [4,5]; Wang, Phys. Rev. A34 (1986) 636 [85]; Kissel, in: Workshop Report on New Dimensions in X-ray Scattering, CONF-870459 (Livermore, 1987) p. 9 [86]) and data collected using a variety of experimental techniques. In both cases the data tabulated in ref. [1] is shown to give improved self-consistency and agreement with experiment. © 1990.