POLITICAL PHENOMENOLOGY: RADICAL DEMOCRACY AND TRUTH

被引:1
|
作者
Gangle, Rocco [1 ]
Smick, Jason [2 ]
机构
[1] Endicott Coll, Philosophy & Relig Dept, 376 Hale St, Beverly, MA 01915 USA
[2] Santa Clara Univ, Religious Studies Dept, Santa Clara, CA 95053 USA
关键词
democracy; epoche; Husserl; Paci; Patocka; phenomenology; reduction;
D O I
10.1558/poth.v10i2.341
中图分类号
B9 [宗教];
学科分类号
010107 ;
摘要
In light of the "theological turn" in recent phenomenology, a question arises for contemporary thought of how the relationships among philosophy, religion, and democratic politics might be recontextualized and understood from a specifically phenomenological perspective. Essential in addressing this question is a critical examination of the method of reduction, or epoche instituted by Edmund Husserl as the original, core practice of phenomenology. Reinterpreting the epoche in terms of its social, historical, and political dimensions, later phenomenologists Enzo Paci and Jan Patocka demonstrate how phenomenology's conception of truth is necessarily coordinated with a commitment to collective democratic praxis. In Paci, the practice of epoche initiates critical resistance to ideological and idolatrous social and political forms through contrast with the infinite openness of truth's real universality. In Patocka, phenomenological method as applied to historically-embedded religious and philosophical traditions helps to clarify what in particular distinguishes democratic from autocratic forms of life. By drawing the insights of Paci and Patocka into conjunction, a new conception emerges of the unique religio-the collective, existential commitment-of phenomenology as such: to express the experience(s) of truth through democratic praxis in collaboration with other analogous philosophical, religious and scientific traditions.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 363
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Meaning, truth, and phenomenology
    Bevir, M
    METAPHILOSOPHY, 2000, 31 (04) : 412 - 426
  • [2] Phenomenology as radical Empiricism
    De Palma, Vittorio
    STUDIA PHAENOMENOLOGICA, 2012, 12 : 331 - 357
  • [3] TRUTH AND LIES IN POLITICS. A VINDICATION OF THE POLITICAL JUDGMENT CRITICAL FOR DEMOCRACY
    Munoz Sanchez, Maria Teresa
    ANDAMIOS, 2020, 17 (44): : 135 - 153
  • [4] Democracy and Truth
    Schamberger, Christoph
    ARCHIV FUR RECHTS- UND SOZIALPHILOSOPHIE, 2025, 111 (01): : 26 - 43
  • [5] Populism, democracy, political style and post-truth: issues for communication research
    Sengul, Kurt
    COMMUNICATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2019, 5 (01) : 88 - 101
  • [6] TRUTH OVER DEMOCRACY OR DEMOCRACY OVER TRUTH? REFLECTIONS ON RORTY AND FEYERABEND
    Lynch, Michael Patrick
    EPISTEMOLOGY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-EPISTEMOLOGIYA I FILOSOFIYA NAUKI, 2024, 61 (03): : 158 - 174
  • [7] Twitter's Role in Digital Democracy, Post-Truth, and Political Polarization
    Yegen, Ceren
    Ayhan, Banyamin
    Demir, Yavuz
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION AND PUBLIC RELATIONS, 2022, 24 (02): : 45 - 67
  • [8] Justice: the truth of democracy
    Dux, Guenter
    OSTERREICHISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT FUER SOZIOLOGIE, 2012, 37 : 23 - 45
  • [9] Truth, Communication, and Democracy
    Porpora, Douglas V.
    Sekalala, Seif
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2019, 13 : 938 - 955
  • [10] On the Erosion of Democracy by Truth
    Vivian, Bradford
    PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC, 2018, 51 (04) : 416 - 440