Staff opinions about the components of a good death in long-term care

Aim: The aim of this study was to identify differences of opinion about the relative importance of different components of a good death among care providers in a long-term care home serving Canadian war veterans. Methods: The Concept of a Good Death scale (Swartz et al, 2003), with slight adaptations to fit the long-term care context, was made available to all staff. Responses were accepted for a one-month period. Findings: Survey return rate was 30.4%. There was a majority (greater than 50%) opinion that 12 of the 20 items were essential or important to a good death, and that three items were not necessary: 'that death is sudden and unexpected' (64.5%), 'that there be control of bodily functions to the end' (61.8%) and 'that there be mental alertness to the end' (55.3%). There was not a majority opinion on the five remaining items: 'that the dying period be short', 'that death occurs naturally without technical equipment', 'that the person lived until a key event', 'that the ability to communicate be present until death', and 'that death occurs during sleep'. Conclusions: Detailed analysis of survey results identified differences of opinion that could have implications for consistency and quality of care. The findings suggest ways in which the unique characteristics of the long-term care environment and population influence opinions about the components of a good death.