PRECISION AND ACCURACY OF IN-VIVO BONE-MINERAL MEASUREMENT IN RATS USING DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY

被引:43
|
作者
ROZENBERG, S
VANDROMME, J
NEVE, J
AGUILERA, A
MUREGANCURO, A
PERETZ, A
KINTHAERT, J
HAM, H
机构
[1] Interdisciplinary Group on Osteoporosis, Free Universities of Brussels, Hôpital Saint-Pierre, Brussels, B-1000
关键词
ACCURACY; BONE MINERAL CONTENT; DXA; OSTEOPOROSIS; PRECISION;
D O I
10.1007/BF01623658
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the precision and accuracy of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for measuring bone mineral content at different sites of the skeleton in rats. In vitro the reproducibility error was very small (< 1%), but in vivo the intra-observer variability ranged from 0.9% to 6.0%. Several factors have been shown to affect in vivo reproducibility: the reproducibility was better when the results were expressed as bone mineral density (BMD) rather than bone mineral content (BMC), intra-observer variability was better than the inter-observer variability, and a higher error was observed for the tibia compared with that for vertebrae and femur. The accuracy of measurement at the femur and tibia was assessed by comparing the values with ash weight and with biochemically determined calcium content. The correlation coefficients (R) between the in vitro BMC and the dry weight or the calcium content were higher than 0.99 for both the femur and the tibia. SEE ranged between 0.0 g (ash weight) and 2.0 mg (Ca content). Using in vitro BMC, ash weight could be estimated with an accuracy error close to 0 and calcium content with an error ranging between 0.82% and 6.80%. The R values obtained between the in vivo and in vitro BMC were 0.98 and 0.97 respectively for femur and tibia, with SEE of 0.04 and 0.02 g respectively. In conclusion, the in vivo precision of the technique was found to be too low. To be of practical use it is important in the design of experimentation to try to reduce the measurement error. This can be achieved by performing measurements in the same position, by repeating measurements several times and by using the mean values of several BMD calculations performed by the same observer on each BMD measurement. Furthermore, better reproducibility can be obtained on the vertebra or the femur than on the tibia.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 53
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PRECISION AND STABILITY OF DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY MEASUREMENTS
    JOHNSON, J
    DAWSONHUGHES, B
    CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1991, 49 (03) : 174 - 178
  • [32] Assessing bone mineral density in vivo: Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
    Hester, PY
    Schreiweis, MA
    Orban, JI
    Mazzuco, H
    Kopka, MN
    Ledur, MC
    Moody, DE
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2004, 83 (02) : 215 - 221
  • [33] Comparison of Differences in Bone Mineral Density Measurement With 3 Hologic Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scan Modes
    Yu, Wei
    Zhang, Zaizhu
    Pan, Wei
    Guan, Wenmin
    Lin, Qiang
    Xia, Weibo
    Li, Taisheng
    Hsieh, Evelyn
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2021, 24 (04) : 645 - 650
  • [34] Forearm Bone Mineral Density Measurement With Different Scanning Positions: A Study in Right-Handed Chinese Using Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry
    Chang, Yin-Juan
    Yu, Wei
    Lin, Qiang
    Yao, Jin-Peng
    Zhou, Xiao-Hong
    Tian, Jun-Ping
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2012, 15 (01) : 67 - 71
  • [35] In vivo intrarater and interrater precision of measuring apparent bone mineral density in vertebral subregions using supine lateral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
    Briggs, AM
    Wark, JD
    Kantor, S
    Teh, R
    Greig, AM
    Fazzalari, NL
    Bennell, KL
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2005, 8 (03) : 314 - 319
  • [36] The reliability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of bone mineral density in the metatarsals
    Fuller, Joel T.
    Archer, Jane
    Buckley, Jonathan D.
    Tsiros, Margarita D.
    Thewlis, Dominic
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 45 (01) : 135 - 140
  • [37] Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
    Nelson B. Watts
    Osteoporosis International, 2004, 15 : 847 - 854
  • [38] Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
    Braillon, Pierre
    Peretti, Noel
    NUTRITION CLINIQUE ET METABOLISME, 2011, 25 (02): : 91 - 96
  • [39] Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry Does Not Represent Bone Structure in Patients with Osteoporosis A Comparison of Lumbar Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry with Vertebral Biopsies
    Pumberger, Matthias
    Palmowski, Yannick
    Strube, Patrick
    Schwemmer, Christin
    Roll, Stephanie
    Zippelius, Timo
    Putzier, Michael
    SPINE, 2021, 46 (13) : 861 - 866
  • [40] A phantom for evaluating bone mineral density of the hand by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry
    Steel, SA
    Swann, P
    Langley, G
    Langton, CM
    PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1997, 18 (03) : 233 - 240