Critical failure factors of Lean Six Sigma: a systematic literature review

被引:335
作者
Albliwi, Saja [1 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Antony, Jiju [2 ,5 ,7 ,8 ]
Lim, Sarina [1 ,5 ,9 ,10 ]
van der Wiele, Ton [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Design Mfg & Engn Management, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Heriot Watt Univ, Sch Management & Languages, Dept Business Management, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam Sch Management, Dept Management Technol & Innovat, Qual Management & Org Performance, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] King Abdulaziz Univ, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[5] Amer Soc Qual, Milwaukee, WI 53023 USA
[6] EurOMA, Brussels, Belgium
[7] Royal Stat Soc, Inst Operat Managment, CQI, London, England
[8] Inst Six Sigma Profess, Newport, England
[9] Univ Strathclyde, Fac Engn, Dept Design Mfg & Engn Management, Stat Proc Control & Design Expt, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[10] Univ Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia
关键词
Six Sigma; Systematic review; Failure; Lean; Lean Six Sigma;
D O I
10.1108/IJQRM-09-2013-0147
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - Lean Six Sigma (LSS) is a continuous improvement methodology that aims to reduce the costs of poor quality, improve the bottom-line results and create value for both customers and shareholders. The purpose of this paper is to explore the critical failure factors for LSS in different sectors, such as manufacturing, services, higher education, etc. Design/methodology/approach - The following research is based on a systematic literature review of 56 papers that were published on Lean, Six Sigma and LSS in well-known academic databases from 1995 to 2013. Findings - There are 34 common failure factors of LSS cited in this paper. There are some common factors for failure, such as a lack of top management commitment and involvement, lack of communication, lack of training and education, limited resources and others. Many gaps and limitations are discussed in this paper and need to be explored in future research. Originality/value - The paper is one of the first systematic literature reviews to explore the critical failure factors of LSS and discuss the top failure factors from different angles, i.e. countries' evolution, organisations' size (small-and medium-sized enterprises and large organisations) and industry nature.
引用
收藏
页码:1012 / 1030
页数:19
相关论文
共 78 条
[11]   Application of Six Sigma DMAIC methodology in a transactional environment [J].
Antony, Jiju ;
Bhuller, Anmol Singh ;
Kumar, Maneesh ;
Mendibil, Kepa ;
Montgomery, Douglas C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2012, 29 (01) :31-+
[12]   Can Six Sigma be the "cure" for our "ailing" NHS? [J].
Antony, Jiju ;
Downey-Ennis, Kay ;
Antony, Frenie ;
Seow, Chris .
LEADERSHIP IN HEALTH SERVICES, 2007, 20 (04) :242-253
[13]   Can Six Sigma be effectively implemented in SMEs? [J].
Antony, Jiju .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2008, 57 (05) :420-423
[14]   Linking learning and knowledge creation to project success in Six Sigma projects: An empirical investigation [J].
Arumugam, V. ;
Antony, Jiju ;
Kumar, Maneesh .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2013, 141 (01) :388-402
[15]   Lean production: a study of application in a traditional manufacturing environment [J].
Bamber, L ;
Dale, BG .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2000, 11 (03) :291-298
[16]  
Belassi W., 1996, INT J PROJ MANAG, V14, P141
[17]   Lean viewed as a philosophy [J].
Bhasin, Sanjay ;
Burcher, Peter .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2006, 17 (01) :56-+
[18]   Prominent obstacles to lean [J].
Bhasin, Sanjay .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 61 (04) :403-425
[19]   An appropriate change strategy for lean success [J].
Bhasin, Sanjay .
MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2012, 50 (3-4) :439-458
[20]   Performance of organisations treating lean as an ideology [J].
Bhasin, Sanjay .
BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2011, 17 (06) :986-1011