SPINE UPDATE PEER-REVIEW - A PROCESS OR A FORMALITY

被引:3
作者
PINKERTON, S [1 ]
WEINSTEIN, JN [1 ]
机构
[1] TEXAS BACK INST RES FDN,PLANO,TX
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199402000-00024
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
[No abstract available]
引用
收藏
页码:380 / 383
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Beyer J.M., Editorial policies and practices among leading journals in four scientific fields, Sociological Quarterly, 19, pp. 68-88, (1978)
[2]  
Branscomb L.M., Misinformation explosion: Is the literature worth reviewing?, Scientific Research, 3, pp. 49-56, (1968)
[3]  
Goffman W., The ecology of the biomedical literature and information retrieval, Coping with the Biomedical Literature, pp. 31-46, (1981)
[4]  
Gordon M., A Study of the Evaluation of Research Papers by Primary Journals in the UK. Primary Communications Research Centre, (1978)
[5]  
Horrobin D.F., Peer review: A philosophically faulty concept which is proving disastrous for science, Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 5, pp. 217-218, (1982)
[6]  
Horrobin D.F., The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation. In: Peer Review in Scientific Publishing: Papers from the First International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication, pp. 27-31, (1991)
[7]  
Ingelfinger F.J., Charity and peer review in publication, N Engl J Med, 293, pp. 1371-1372, (1975)
[8]  
Lock S., Information overload: Solution by Quality?, Br Med J, 284, pp. 1289-1290, (1982)
[9]  
Lock S.A., Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine, (1986)
[10]  
Lock S., Smith J., The Community of Referees. In: Peer Review in Scientific Publishing: Papers from the First International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. Chicago, pp. 27-31, (1991)