共 3 条
- [1] Burke Edmund, 1793, PROJECT GUTENBERG EB
- [2] Fish S., 2011, NY TIMES
- [3] Winter Steven, 2001, CLEARING FOREST LAW, P216
Lautsi: A Case of "Metaphysical Madness"?
被引：0
作者：
de Been, Wouter
[1
]
机构：
[1] Erasmus Sch Law, Legal Theory, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词：
Lautsi;
religious symbols;
public sphere;
Burke;
margin of appreciation;
prudence;
D O I：
10.1163/187103211X599382
中图分类号：
B9 [宗教];
学科分类号：
010107 ;
摘要：
As a piece of doctrinal argument the 2009 ruling on Lautsi v. Italy by a Chamber of the Second Section of the ECHR may have been more elegant and convincing. Yet, elaborating doctrinal logic does not exhaust the task of an international court. Hence, even though the recent Grand Chamber reversal displays less doctrinal finesse, it is a more prudent decision appropriately sensitive to the social context.
引用
收藏
页码：231 / 235
页数：5
相关论文