Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Using Pneumatic Lithotripsy (Lithoclast (R)) Alone or in Combination with Ultrasonic Lithotripsy

被引:19
作者
Cho, C. One [1 ]
Yu, Ji Hyeong [1 ]
Sung, Luck Hee [1 ]
Chung, Jae Yong [1 ]
Noh, Choong Hee [1 ]
机构
[1] Inje Univ, Coll Med, Dept Urol, 761-7,Sanggye 7 Dong, Seoul 139707, South Korea
关键词
Kidney calculi; Lithotripsy; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy;
D O I
10.4111/kju.2010.51.11.783
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the procedure of choice for treating large renal stones. Pneumatic lithotripsy (Lithoclast.) is effective regardless of the stones' composition, and ultrasonic lithotripsy allows the aspiration of small debris during lithotripsy. We investigated the efficacy and safety of PCNL via Lithoclast. alone or combined with ultrasonic lithotripsy. Materials and Methods: Thirty-five (group A) and 39 (group B) patients underwent Lithoclast. PCNL and combination therapy, respectively, from May 2001 to March 2010, and the two groups were compared in terms of stone size, location, and composition; operative time; average number of treatments; hospital days; hemoglobin loss; ancillary procedures; rate of device failure; and initial and total stone-free rates. Results: The two groups did not differ significantly in preoperative stone size, location, or composition; the average number of treatments; or the initial and overall stone-free rates. However, combination therapy was associated with a significantly lower operative time (181+/-50 vs. 221+/-65 min, respectively, p=0.004), number of hospital days (11.6+/-3.8 vs. 14.2+/-4.4 days, respectively, p=0.009), and average hemoglobin loss (1.12+/-0.61 vs. 1.39+/-1.02 g/dl, respectively, p=0.013). Transfusions were required in 6 patients (4 and 2 in each group, respectively), but there were no significant complications related to percutaneous access. There were 2 (5.7%) mechanical failures (Lithoclast. probe fracture) in the group A and 5 (12.8%) in the group B (2 cases of suction tube obstruction, 3 cases of overheating). Conclusions: The combination of ultrasonic lithotripter and Lithoclast. is more effective than Lithoclast. alone because it significantly decreases operative time, hemoglobin loss, and the hospital stay. This may reflect the superior power of Lithoclast. and the ability to aspirate the debris during ultrasonic lithotripsy.
引用
收藏
页码:783 / 787
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   In vitro comparison of standard ultrasound and pneumatic lithotrites with a new combination intracorporeal lithotripsy device [J].
Auge, BK ;
Lallas, CD ;
Pietrow, PK ;
Zhong, P ;
Preminger, GM .
UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (01) :28-32
[2]  
Begun F P, 1994, Semin Urol, V12, P39
[3]   KIDNEY STONE REMOVAL - PERCUTANEOUS VERSUS SURGICAL LITHOTOMY [J].
BRANNEN, GE ;
BUSH, WH ;
CORREA, RJ ;
GIBBONS, RP ;
ELDER, JS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1985, 133 (01) :6-12
[4]   Influence of technique of percutaneous tract creation on incidence of renal hemorrhage [J].
Davidoff, R ;
Bellman, GC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (04) :1229-1231
[5]   PERCUTANEOUS PYELOLITHOTOMY - NEW EXTRACTION TECHNIQUE [J].
FERNSTROM, I ;
JOHANSSON, B .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 1976, 10 (03) :257-259
[6]  
FUCHS GJ, 1988, UROL CLIN N AM, V15, P347
[7]   Prospective evaluation of safety and efficacy of the supracostal approach for percutaneous nephrolithotomy [J].
Gupta, R ;
Kumar, A ;
Kapoor, R ;
Srivastava, A ;
Mandhani, A .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 90 (09) :809-813
[8]   ELECTROHYDRAULIC VERSUS PNEUMATIC DISINTEGRATION IN THE TREATMENT OF URETERAL STONES - A RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE TRIAL [J].
HOFBAUER, J ;
HOBARTH, K ;
MARBERGER, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 153 (03) :623-625
[9]   Clinical experience with a new ultrasonic and LithoClast combination for percutaneous litholapaxy [J].
Hofmann, R ;
Olbert, P ;
Weber, J ;
Wille, S ;
Varga, Z .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 90 (01) :16-19
[10]   Experimental studies and first clinical experience with a new lithoclast and ultrasound combination for lithotripsy [J].
Hofmann, R ;
Weber, J ;
Heidenreich, A ;
Varga, Z ;
Olbert, P .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2002, 42 (04) :376-381