Developing and validating a psychometric scale for image quality assessment

被引:9
作者
Mraity, H. [1 ,2 ]
England, A. [1 ]
Hogg, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salford, Salford M5 4WT, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Kufa, Kufa, Iraq
关键词
Pelvis; Image quality; Psychometric scale;
D O I
10.1016/j.radi.2014.04.002
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Using AP pelvis as a catalyst, this paper explains how a psychometric scale for image quality assessment can be created using Bandura's theory for self-efficacy. Background: Establishing an accurate diagnosis is highly dependent upon the quality of the radiographic image. Image quality, as a construct (i. e. set of attributes that makes up the image quality), continues to play an essential role in the field of diagnostic radiography. The process of assessing image quality can be facilitated by using criteria, such as the European Commission (EC) guidelines for quality criteria as published in 1996. However, with the advent of new technology (Computed Radiography and Digital Radiography), some of the EC criteria may no longer be suitable for assessing the visual quality of a digital radiographic image. Moreover, a lack of validated visual image quality scales in the literature can also lead to significant variations in image quality evaluation. Creating and validating visual image quality scales, using a robust methodology, could reduce variability and improve the validity and reliability of perceptual image quality evaluations. (C) 2014 The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 311
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Automated Image Quality Assessment for Certificates and Bills
    Jiang, Fei
    Zhang, Liang-Jie
    Chen, Huan
    [J]. 2017 IEEE 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE COMPUTING (ICCC 2017), 2017, : 1 - 8
  • [32] Image Quality Assessment Using Contrastive Learning
    Madhusudana, Pavan C.
    Birkbeck, Neil
    Wang, Yilin
    Adsumilli, Balu
    Bovik, Alan C.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2022, 31 : 4149 - 4161
  • [33] Image quality assessment based on noise detection
    Joshi, Piyush
    Prakash, Surya
    [J]. 2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL PROCESSING AND INTEGRATED NETWORKS (SPIN), 2014, : 755 - 759
  • [34] Image quality assessment based on a degradation model
    Damera-Venkata, N
    Kite, TD
    Geisler, WS
    Evans, BL
    Bovik, AC
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2000, 9 (04) : 636 - 650
  • [35] Perceptual assessment of image quality in multimedia technology
    Fliegel, Karel
    [J]. MATHEMATICS OF DATA/IMAGE PATTERN RECOGNITION, COMPRESSION, CODING, AND ENCRYPTION X, WITH APPLICATIONS, 2007, 6700
  • [36] Advances in ultrasonography: image formation and quality assessment
    Hideyuki Hasegawa
    [J]. Journal of Medical Ultrasonics, 2021, 48 : 377 - 389
  • [37] Image Quality Assessment for Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Kastryulin, Sergey
    Zakirov, Jamil
    Pezzotti, Nicola
    Dylov, Dmitry V.
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 14154 - 14168
  • [38] Investigation into the computer assessment of image quality in mammography
    Kaplish, A
    Pretlove, JRG
    Young, KC
    Horton, PW
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 1996: IMAGE PROCESSING, 1996, 2710 : 979 - 987
  • [39] Topological Image Texture Analysis for Quality Assessment
    Asaad, Aras T.
    Rashid, Rasber Dh.
    Jassim, Sabah A.
    [J]. MOBILE MULTIMEDIA/IMAGE PROCESSING, SECURITY, AND APPLICATIONS 2017, 2017, 10221
  • [40] A New Scheme for No Reference Image Quality Assessment
    Chetouani, Aladine
    Beghdadi, Azeddine
    Bouzerdoum, Abdesselim
    Deriche, Mohamed
    [J]. 2012 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING THEORY, TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2012, : 270 - 274