Impacts and perceptions of a computer-based length of stay benchmarking program

被引:1
作者
Roberts, Kate [1 ]
Stiller, Kathy [2 ]
Harling, Rachel [3 ]
Lynch, Elizabeth [3 ]
Forward, Sally [4 ]
机构
[1] Hampstead Rehabil Ctr, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Physiotherapy Dept, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Hampstead Rehabil Ctr, Stroke Rehabil Unit, Northfield, SA, Australia
[4] Hampstead Rehabil Ctr, Brain Injury Rehabil Unit, Northfield, SA, Australia
关键词
Length of stay; Patient discharge; Benchmarking; Attitudes of health professionals;
D O I
10.12968/ijtr.2013.20.5.237
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Aims: Length of stay (LOS) benchmark figures can be used to guide clinical practice in a rehabilitation setting. This prospective study trialled a computer-based program that provided real-time LOS benchmark figures and alerted staff of patients approaching or exceeding LOS benchmark figures, and assessed its ability to identify patients with LOS beyond benchmark figures, reasons for these delays and effect on LOS, and staff perceptions of its usefulness. Methods: One-hundred-and-eight inpatients in a stroke rehabilitation unit (SRU) and 94 inpatients in a brain injury rehabilitation unit (BIRU) were included in the patient component of the study; 13 staff completed a post-trial survey. Findings: LOS in excess of benchmark figures was found for 48 (44%) SRU and 44 (47%) BIRU participants, resulting in a total discharge delay of 6311 days. Reasons for discharge delay were diverse. Using the computer-based program did not consistently decrease LOS compared to data from the previous year. Staff perceptions regarding the usefulness of the computer-based program were mixed. Conclusions: The use of a computer-based program that provided real-time LOS benchmark figures was able to identify patients with LOS beyond benchmark figures but did not consistently decrease LOS and, on the whole, was not favourably received by clinical staff.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 245
页数:9
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, 2013, AUSTR SAF QUAL GOALS
  • [2] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2008, AUSTRS HLTH 2008
  • [3] Impact of benchmarking and clinical decision making tools on rehabilitation length of stay following spinal cord injury
    Burns, A. S.
    Yee, J.
    Flett, H. M.
    Guy, K.
    Cournoyea, N.
    [J]. SPINAL CORD, 2013, 51 (02) : 165 - 169
  • [4] Drolz E, 2006, GOAL LENGTH STAY TOO
  • [5] The Australian National Sub-acute and Non-acute Patient Casemix Classification (AN-SNAP): Its application and value in a stroke rehabilitation programme
    Lowthian, P
    Disler, P
    Ma, S
    Eagar, K
    Green, J
    de Graaff, S
    [J]. CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2000, 14 (05) : 532 - 537
  • [6] Length of stay benchmarks for inpatient rehabilitation after stroke
    Meyer, Matthew
    Britt, Eileen
    McHale, Heather A.
    Teasell, Robert
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2012, 34 (13) : 1077 - 1081
  • [7] Length of stay in an Australian stroke rehabilitation unit: a pilot study
    Roberts, Kate
    Stiller, Kathy
    Harling, Rachel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERAPY AND REHABILITATION, 2010, 17 (10) : 535 - 544
  • [8] Simmonds F, 2009, AROC BENCHMARKING
  • [9] Length of stay, discharge destination, and functional improvement - Utility of the Australian National Subacute and Nonacute Patient Casemix Classification
    Tooth, L
    McKenna, K
    Goh, K
    Varghese, P
    [J]. STROKE, 2005, 36 (07) : 1519 - 1525