Effect of the Pay-for-Performance Program for Breast Cancer Care in Taiwan

被引:8
作者
Kuo, Raymond N. C.
Chung, Kuo-Piao
Lai, Mei-Shu
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Publ Hlth, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JOP.2011.000314
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of the nationwide pay-for-performance (P4P) program for breast cancer care (BC-P4P) in Taiwan on care quality patient survival and recurrence. Study Design: A population-based observational study with cross-sectional design. Methods: Retrospective analysis of population-based cancer registration and claims data was used in this study. A total of 4,528 patients with stage I or II breast cancer diagnosed in 2002 or 2003 who received curative surgery were observed until the end of 2008. This study applied multivariate linear regression to explore the association between BC-P4P enrollment and quality of care. Cox regression was applied to examine the effect of BC-P4P enrollment on 5-year recurrence and overall survival among patients with breast cancer. Results: After controlling for age, stage, type of surgery, and other factors BC-P4P enrollees were found to have received better quality care than nonenrollees (P = .001). Cox regression models also indicated that after controlling for patient characteristics quality of care was related to better 5-year overall survival (odds ratio [OR] 0.212 P = .001) and recurrence (OR 0.289 P < .001). Even when controlled by quality of care provided to patients and its interaction with status of BC-P4P enrollment BC-P4P enrollment remained statistically significant regarding 5-year overall survival (OR 0.167 P = .001) and recurrence (OR 0.370 P = .002). Conclusion: Patients with breast cancer enrolled in the BC-P4P program received better quality care and had better outcome than nonenrolled patients. Evidence from this study indicates that financial incentives in the payment design had a positive impact on outcome of breast cancer care.
引用
收藏
页码:E8S / E15S
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[21]   Data sources for measuring comorbidity - A comparison of hospital records and medicare claims for cancer patients [J].
Klabunde, Carrie N. ;
Harlan, Linda C. ;
Warren, Joan L. .
MEDICAL CARE, 2006, 44 (10) :921-928
[22]   Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data [J].
Klabunde, CN ;
Potosky, AL ;
Legler, JM ;
Warren, JL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 53 (12) :1258-1267
[23]  
Lee TT, 2010, AM J MANAG CARE, V16, P65
[24]   The impact of removing financial incentives from clinical quality indicators: longitudinal analysis of four Kaiser Permanente indicators [J].
Lester, Helen ;
Schmittdiel, Julie ;
Selby, Joe ;
Fireman, Bruce ;
Campbell, Stephen ;
Lee, Janelle ;
Whippy, Alan ;
Madvig, Philip .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 340 :1072
[25]   The effects of pay-for-performance on tuberculosis treatment in Taiwan [J].
Li, Ya-Hsin ;
Tsai, Wen-Chen ;
Khan, Mahmud ;
Yang, Wen-Ta ;
Lee, Tsuey-Fong ;
Wu, Yi-Chun ;
Kung, Pei-Tseng .
HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2010, 25 (04) :334-341
[26]   Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement [J].
Lindenauer, Peter K. ;
Remus, Denise ;
Roman, Sheila ;
Rothberg, Michael B. ;
Benjamin, Evan M. ;
Ma, Allen ;
Bratzler, Dale W. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (05) :486-496
[27]  
Magnus SA, 1999, HEALTH CARE MANAGE R, V24, P57
[28]   Validity of cancer registry data for measuring the quality of breast cancer care [J].
Malin, JL ;
Kahn, KL ;
Adams, J ;
Kwan, L ;
Laouri, M ;
Ganz, PA .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2002, 94 (11) :835-844
[29]  
McDermott S, 2006, ADV QUALITY COLLABOR
[30]   Quality-based payment: six case examples [J].
McNamara, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2005, 17 (04) :357-362