Variation in performance of the EMG examination at six European laboratories

被引:21
作者
FuglsangFrederiksen, A
Johnsen, B
Vingtoft, S
Carvalho, M
Fawcett, P
Liguori, R
Nix, W
Schofield, I
Veloso, M
Vila, A
机构
[1] HOSP SANTA MARIA,DEPT NEUROL,LISBON,PORTUGAL
[2] NEWCASTLE GEN HOSP,DEPT CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL,NEWCASTLE TYNE NE4 6BE,TYNE & WEAR,ENGLAND
[3] UNIV BOLOGNA,INST NEUROL,BOLOGNA,ITALY
[4] UNIV CLIN,DEPT NEUROL,MAINZ,GERMANY
[5] HOSP EGAS MONIZ,DEPT NEUROL,LISBON,PORTUGAL
[6] UNIV GRENOBLE,CHU GRENOBLE,LAB ELECTROMYOG,GRENOBLE,FRANCE
来源
ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY | 1995年 / 97卷 / 06期
关键词
EMG; nerve conduction study; number of EMG tests; EMG examination; variation among EMG laboratories;
D O I
10.1016/0924-980X(95)00149-F
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The quality of the EMG examination might be improved by standardization. However, knowledge about interlaboratory differences in the performance of the EMG examination is a prerequisite for standardization. The aim of this study was to describe differences in EMG techniques used and number of muscles and nerves examined per patient at 6 European EMG laboratories. The EMG results of 595 patients were prospectively sampled. The average number of muscles examined per patient in different disorders varied from laboratory to laboratory, for example from 3.0 to 10.8 muscles in anterior horn cell disorders and from 2.0 to 5.5 muscles in myopathies. The average number of muscles examined by quantitative EMG varied from 0 to 4.3 in anterior horn cell disorders and from 0.0 to 4.5 in myopathies. Also the average number of nerve segments examined per patient varied from laboratory to laboratory for example from 2.7 to 17.7 for motor segments and from 3.1 to 9.0 for sensory segments in polyneuropathies. The laboratories that used needle electrodes for nerve conduction studies and quantitative analysis of individual motor unit potentials examined a smaller number of muscles and nerves than laboratories using surface electrodes for nerve conduction studies and qualitative EMG studies. The results of this study may have impact on guidelines and examination protocols as well as on quality assurance.
引用
收藏
页码:444 / 450
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Buchthal F., 1991, METHODS CLIN NEUROPH, V2, P25
[2]  
BUCHTHAL F, 1957, INTRO ELECTROMYOGRAP, P43
[3]  
Falck B, 1994, METHODS CLIN NEUROPH, V5, P1
[4]  
Fuglsang-Frederiksen A., 1989, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, V1, P117, DOI 10.1016/0933-3657(89)90002-X
[5]  
FUGLSANGFREDERI.A, 1994, MUSCLE NERVE, V17, P1125
[6]   DIFFERENCES IN THE HANDLING OF THE EMG EXAMINATION AT 7 EUROPEAN LABORATORIES [J].
JOHNSEN, B ;
FUGLSANGFREDERIKSEN, A ;
VINGTOFT, S ;
FAWCETT, P ;
LIGUORI, R ;
NIX, W ;
OTTE, G ;
PROENCA, J ;
SCHOFIELD, I ;
SIEBEN, G ;
VELOSO, M ;
VILA, A .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 93 (02) :155-158
[7]  
JOHNSEN B, 1994, 12TH P INT C EUR FED, P150
[8]  
Trojaborg W., 1992, METH CLIN NEUROPHYSI, V3, P17
[9]   KANDID - AN EMG DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM - EVALUATED IN A EUROPEAN MULTICENTER TRIAL [J].
VINGTOFT, S ;
FUGLSANGFREDERIKSEN, A ;
RONAGER, J ;
PETRERA, J ;
STIGSBY, B ;
WILLISON, RG ;
JARRATT, JA ;
FAWCETT, PRW ;
SCHOFIELD, IS ;
OTTE, G ;
SIEBEN, G ;
VILA, A .
MUSCLE & NERVE, 1993, 16 (05) :520-529
[10]   ESTEEM (EUROPEAN STANDARDIZED TELEMATIC TOOL TO EVALUATE EMG KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS AND METHODS) - AIM PROJECT A2010 [J].
VINGTOFT, S ;
VELOSO, M ;
FUGLSANGFREDERIKSEN, A ;
JOHNSEN, B ;
VILA, A ;
BARAHONA, P ;
FAWCETT, P ;
SCOFIELD, I ;
LJORRING, A ;
OTTE, G ;
SIEBEN, G ;
TALBOT, A ;
LIGUORI, R ;
NIX, W .
COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 1994, 45 (1-2) :61-63