Special Privileges or Equality? Legal Protection for NPO Property Rights - With a Discussion of the Meaning and Limitations of the "Public-Interest Property Rights" Concept

被引：0

作者：

Jin Jinping ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Peking Univ, Law Sch, Law, Nonprofit Org Law Res Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China

来源：

CHINA NONPROFIT REVIEW | 2010年 / 2卷 / 01期

关键词：

Nonprofit organizations; public-interest property rights; property rights;

D O I：

10.1163/187650910X12605098378932

中图分类号：

C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];

学科分类号：

12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;

摘要：

The concept of "public-interest property rights" () has helped to clarify the jurisdiction over NPOs' assets and has also underscored some special issues related to their use. At the same time, however, the concept may cause misconceptions about the legal status of NPOs' property rights; NPOs' exceptional characteristics should not negate their own property rights, nor should NPOs be granted any special legal status relative to other private law entities on their basis.

引用

页码：3 / 18

页数：16

共 19 条

[1]

Adler Betsy Buchalter, 2007, RULES ROAD GUIDE LAW

[2]

Chinese Civil Organizations Administration Work Report, 2000, CHINA SOCIAL BENEFIT

[3]

Colley John, 2003, GONG SI ZHI LI JIAN, V266

[4]

Gray Bradford, 1991, PROFITS PATIENT CARE

[5]

Guoan Zheng, 2000, GUO WAI NPOS FA LV F, V87

[6]

Hansmann Henry, 2001, QI YE SUO YOU QUAN, V332

[7]

Hong Qi, 2003, ZHONGGUO ZHENG FA DA, V7, P44

[8]

Jinping Jin, 2005, FEI YING FA REN ZHI, V43

[9]

Jinping Jin, 2005, FEI YING LI FA REN Z

[10]

Lawson, 1998, CAI CHAN FA, V114

← 1 2 →