MULTIOBJECTIVE DECISION-MAKING FOR TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT

被引:0
作者
TZENG, GH
CHEN, CH
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF IRVINE,DEPT CIVIL ENGN,IRVINE,CA 92717
[2] NATL CHIAO TUNG UNIV,ENERGY GRP,HSINCHU,TAIWAN
[3] INST TRANSPORTAT STUDIES,IRVINE,CA
关键词
COMPROMISE SOLUTION; DESCRIPTIVE AND NORMATIVE APPROACH; MCDM-MULTIOBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING; NONINFERIOR SOLUTION; PAIRWISE COMPARISON; PREFERENCE; TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In traditional traffic-assignment problems, only a single objective is considered. Although people's living quality improves and transportation needs increase, the environmental quality is destroyed with rapid economic and traffic growth. The concept of traffic assignment, an important procedure for transportation planning, should take all needs into consideration. Based on the viewpoints of all constituencies, this paper attempts to determine optimal flow patterns using three objectives-total travel time for road users, air pollution for nonusers (such as community residents), and travel distance for government-to formulate an effective multiobjective model for traffic assignment. By using multiobjective decision making and nonlinear programming techniques, a series of noninferior solutions is generated. By combining an eigenvector weighting method with pairwise comparison, we obtain a compromise solution for the flow pattern. An application case for the Taipei network system is also presented and discussed. The results show that if other nontraffic related factors are taken into account, the multiobjective traffic-assignment approach is more reasonable and suitable than conventional approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 187
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Expert group decision-making in corporate identity restyling
    Shestakevych, Tetiana
    Logoyda, Mykola
    Marikutsa, Uliana
    2022 IEEE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCES AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES (CSIT), 2022, : 230 - 234
  • [32] Decision Aids for Shared Decision-making in Uro-oncology: A Systematic Review
    Gruene, Britta
    Kriegmair, Maximilian C.
    Lenhart, Maximilian
    Michel, Maurice S.
    Huber, Johannes
    Koether, Anja K.
    Buedenbender, Bjorn
    Alpers, Georg W.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2022, 8 (03): : 851 - 869
  • [33] Risk-taking in entrepreneurial decision-making: A dynamic model of venture decision
    Li, Yan
    Ahlstrom, David
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2020, 37 (03) : 899 - 933
  • [34] Partitioned fuzzy measure-based linear assignment method for Pythagorean fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making with a new likelihood
    Liang, Decui
    Darko, Adjei Peter
    Xu, Zeshui
    Zhang, Yinrunjie
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2020, 71 (05) : 831 - 845
  • [35] Does Speeded Decision-Making Reveal Tacit Teleological Tendencies?
    Roberts, Andrew J.
    Handley, Simon J.
    Polito, Vince
    COLLABRA-PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [36] Interpretable systems based on evidential prospect theory for decision-making
    Kavya, Ramisetty
    Christopher, Jabez
    APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 53 (02) : 1640 - 1665
  • [37] Group Decision-Making Approach without Weighted Aggregation Operators
    Jiang, Min
    Meng, Zhiqing
    Shen, Rui
    DISCRETE DYNAMICS IN NATURE AND SOCIETY, 2018, 2018
  • [38] Testing cognitive models of decision-making: selected studies with starlings
    Kacelnik, Alex
    Vasconcelos, Marco
    Monteiro, Tiago
    ANIMAL COGNITION, 2023, 26 (01) : 117 - 127
  • [39] Static Model of Decision-Making over the Set of Coalitional Partitions
    Grigorieva, Xeniya
    CONTRIBUTIONS TO GAME THEORY AND MANAGEMENT, VOL V, 2012, 5 : 97 - 106
  • [40] Prioritarianism and Other-Regarding Decision-Making under Risk
    Volacu, Alexandru
    ETHICAL PERSPECTIVES, 2017, 24 (02) : 199 - 224