Access to kidney transplantation: outcomes of the non-referred

被引:9
作者
AlBugami, Meteb M. [1 ]
Panek, Romuald [1 ]
Soroka, Steven [1 ]
Tennankore, Karthik [1 ]
Kiberd, Bryce A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Med, 5820 Univ Ave, Halifax, NS B3H 1V8, Canada
来源
TRANSPLANTATION RESEARCH | 2012年 / 1卷
关键词
Ageism; End stage renal disease; Kidney transplantation; Wait list; Eligibility; Candidacy;
D O I
10.1186/2047-1440-1-22
中图分类号
R3 [基础医学]; R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1001 ; 1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: There is a concern that some, especially older people, are not referred and could benefit from transplantation. Methods: We retrospectively examined consecutive incident end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients at our center from January 2006 to December 2009. At ESRD start, patients were classified into those with or without contraindications using Canadian eligibility criteria. Based on referral for transplantation, patients were grouped as CANDIDATE (no contraindication and referred), NEITHER (no contraindication and not referred) and CONTRAINDICATION. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to assess comorbidity burden. Results: Of the 437 patients, 133 (30.4%) were CANDIDATE (mean age 50 and CCI 3.0), 59 (13.5%) were NEITHER (age 76 and CCI 4.4), and 245 (56.1%) were CONTRAINDICATION (age 65 and CCI 5.5). Age was the best discriminator between NEITHER and CANDIDATES (c- statistic 0.96, P <0.0001) with CCI being less discriminative (0.692, P <0.001). CANDIDATES had excellent survival whereas those patients designated NEITHER and CONTRAINDICATION had high mortality rates. NEITHER patients died or developed a contraindication at very high rates. By 1.5 years 50% of the NEITHER patients were no longer eligible for a transplant. Conclusions: There exists a relatively small population of incident patients not referred who have no contraindications. These are older patients with significant comorbidity who have a small window of opportunity for kidney transplantation.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Ansell D, 2008, TRANSPLANTATION S2, V314
  • [2] A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION
    CHARLSON, ME
    POMPEI, P
    ALES, KL
    MACKENZIE, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05): : 373 - 383
  • [3] Ageism and kidney transplantation
    Curtis, JJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 6 (06) : 1264 - 1266
  • [4] The impact of waiting time and comorbid conditions on the survival benefit of kidney transplantation
    Gill, JS
    Tonelli, M
    Johnson, N
    Kiberd, B
    Landsberg, D
    Pereira, BJG
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 68 (05) : 2345 - 2351
  • [5] Candidacy for Kidney Transplantation of Older Adults
    Grams, Morgan E.
    Kucirka, Lauren M.
    Hanrahan, Colleen F.
    Montgomery, Robert A.
    Massie, Allan B.
    Segev, Dorry L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2012, 60 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [6] Access to the kidney transplant wait list
    Kiberd, B.
    Boudreault, J.
    Bhan, V.
    Panek, R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 6 (11) : 2714 - 2720
  • [7] Knoll G, 2005, CAN MED ASSOC J, V173, P1181, DOI 10.1503/cmaj.051291
  • [8] Is Kidney Transplantation for Everyone? The Example of the Older Dialysis Patient
    Knoll, Greg A.
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2009, 4 (12): : 2040 - 2044
  • [9] Live and deceased donor kidney transplantation in patients aged 75 years and older in the United States
    Macrae, Jeanne
    Friedman, Amy L.
    Friedman, Eli A.
    Eggers, Paul
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2005, 37 (03) : 641 - 648
  • [10] Deceased-donor characteristics and the survival benefit of kidney transplantation
    Merion, RM
    Ashby, VB
    Wolfe, RA
    Distant, DA
    Hulbert-Shearon, TE
    Metzger, RA
    Ojo, AO
    Port, FK
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (21): : 2726 - 2733