Failures in the system: our inability to learn from inquiries

被引:7
作者
Benbow, Susan M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Staffordshire, Ctr Ageing & Mental Hlth, Mental Hlth & Ageing, Stoke On Trent, Staffs, England
[2] Wolverhampton City PCT, Wolverhampton, W Midlands, England
关键词
older people's mental health; institutional abuse; Rowan report; Avonside report; safeguarding vulnerable adults; adult protection;
D O I
10.1108/14668203200800015
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
The Rowan report was published in 2003, following an investigation into allegations of abuse on a ward providing long-term care for older people with mental health problems. The factors identified as important were similar to those identified in other inquiries that took place before and after the Rowan inquiry. Why do organisations fail to learn the lessons of the past? This paper examines what happened following publication of the Rowan report and the ensuing publicity. Some positive outcomes are identified but, putting these in context, it seems unlikely that they will prevent further incidents. How do organisations prevent incidents/suspicions of abuse? The author suggests a multi-level approach and argues that residential and nursing care is at least equally at risk. The fundamental problem lies in society's failure to prioritise and adequately resource the care of older people with dementia and other mental health problems.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 13
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Age Concern, 2005, HOW AG BRIT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, OUR HLTH OUR CAR OUR
[3]  
[Anonymous], NEW AMB OLD AG NEXT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1980, COMMUNICATION ACTION
[5]  
Butler T, 2004, J ADULT PROTECTION, V6, P22
[6]  
CHI, 2003, INV MATT AR ROW WARD
[7]  
CHI, 2000, INV N LAK NHS TRUST
[8]  
Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI), 2007, RIGHTS RISKS RESTR E
[9]  
*CSCI, 2006, JOINT INV PROV SERV
[10]  
CSIP, 2005, EV BUS INT MENT HLTH