Writing an Effective Literature Review

被引:29
作者
Bolderston, Amanda [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Network, Princess Margaret Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jmir.2008.04.009
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A literature review can be an informative, critical, and useful synthesis of a particular topic. It can identify what is known (and unknown) in the subject area, identify areas of controversy or debate, and help formulate questions that need further research. There are several commonly used formats for literature reviews, including systematic reviews conducted as primary research projects; reviews written as an introduction and foundation for a research study, such as a thesis or dissertation; and reviews as secondary data analysis research projects. Regardless of the type, a good review is characterized by the author's efforts to evaluate and critically analyze the relevant work in the field. Published reviews can be invaluable, because they collect and disseminate evidence from diverse sources and disciplines to inform professional practice on a particular topic. This directed reading will introduce the learner to the process of conducting and writing their own literature review.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 92
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], LIT REV
  • [2] [Anonymous], MESH HEAD
  • [3] [Anonymous], UND MED SUBJ HEAD ME
  • [4] Brettle A, 2003, RADIOGRAPHY, V9, P229
  • [5] Burns N. A., 2001, PRACTICE NURSING RES, V4th ed.
  • [6] Grey literature in meta-analyses
    Conn, VS
    Valentine, JC
    Cooper, HM
    Rantz, MJ
    [J]. NURSING RESEARCH, 2003, 52 (04) : 256 - 261
  • [7] FINK A, 2004, CONDUCTING RES LIT R
  • [8] Preparing a grant proposal - Part 2 - Reviewing the literature
    Gray, M
    Bliss, DZ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOUND OSTOMY AND CONTINENCE NURSING, 2005, 32 (02) : 83 - 86
  • [9] Gray M, 1995, J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, V22, P71
  • [10] EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE - A NEW APPROACH TO TEACHING THE PRACTICE OF MEDICINE
    GUYATT, G
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 268 (17): : 2420 - 2425