The biplanar oncoplastic technique case series: a 2-year review

被引:7
作者
Kaminsky, Alexander J. [1 ]
Patel, Ketan M. [2 ]
Cocilovo, Costanza [1 ]
Nahabedian, Maurice Y. [2 ]
Miraliakbari, Reza
机构
[1] INOVA Fairfax Hosp, Falls Church, VA 22042 USA
[2] Georgetown Univ Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, Washington, DC 20007 USA
关键词
Breast; breast reconstruction; lumpectomy; oncoplasty; partial mastectomy;
D O I
10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.04.07
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Oncoplastic techniques for breast reconstruction following partial mastectomy are now commonly included in the armamentarium of most reconstructive plastic surgeons. These techniques have been frequently used for women with large breast volume and less frequently used form women with small to moderate breast volume. Most women with smaller breast volumes have been typically considered for mastectomy. As an alternative to mastectomy, the biplanar technique was designed and described as an oncoplastic option. The purpose of this manuscript is to review our 2-year experience using this technique in a series of women with small to moderate breast volume. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent oncoplastic surgery from 2011-2012 by the senior authors (RM and MYN) was completed. Ten patients were identified that had the biplanar technique involving glandular tissue rearrangement in conjunction with the immediate placement of a submuscular implant or tissue expander. Patient demographics, perioperative details, and post-operative outcomes were evaluated. Results: The mean age and BMI of the ten patients in the study was 56 years (range, 40-68 years) and 24.1 years (range, 20.3-28.6 years) respectively. The mean resection volume was 76.5 g (range, 25-164 g). Eight patients had placement of a permanent implant and two patients had placement of a tissue expander. The average volume of the implanted devices was 138 cc (range, 90-300 cc). In eight patients, a sheet of acellular dermal matrix was used. Immediate biplanar reconstruction was performed in seven patients and a staged-immediate biplanar reconstruction was performed in three patients. Complications included a positive margin on final pathology requiring mastectomy (n=1), infection (n=1), incisional dehiscence following radiation (n=1), and loss of nipple sensation (n=2). Follow-up ranged from 4.5-27 months (mean of 19.5 months). Conclusions: The biplanar oncoplastic technique may represent a valuable option in women with small to moderate breast volumes that choose to have breast conservation therapy (BCT). This technique has demonstrated success with minimizing contour irregularities and maintaining breast volume. Based on our early experience, patient satisfaction is favorable.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 262
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Oncoplastic breast surgery: A review and systematic approach [J].
Berry, M. G. ;
Fitoussi, A. D. ;
Curnier, A. ;
Couturaud, B. ;
Salmon, R. J. .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2010, 63 (08) :1233-1243
[2]   Reconstruction after conservative treatment for breast cancer: Cosmetic sequelae classification revisited [J].
Clough, KB ;
Thomas, SS ;
Fitoussi, AD ;
Couturaud, B ;
Reyal, F ;
Falcon, MC .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 114 (07) :1743-1753
[3]   Oncological Advantages of Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery in Treatment of Early Breast Cancer [J].
Down, Sue K. ;
Jha, Pankaj K. ;
Burger, Amy ;
Hussien, Maged I. .
BREAST JOURNAL, 2013, 19 (01) :56-63
[4]   REANALYSIS AND RESULTS AFTER 12 YEARS OF FOLLOW-UP IN A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL COMPARING TOTAL MASTECTOMY WITH LUMPECTOMY WITH OR WITHOUT IRRADIATION IN THE TREATMENT OF BREAST-CANCER [J].
FISHER, B ;
ANDERSON, S ;
REDMOND, CK ;
WOLMARK, N ;
WICKERHAM, DL ;
CRONIN, WM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 333 (22) :1456-1461
[5]   Management of the Post-Breast-Conserving Therapy Defect: Extended Follow-Up and Reclassification [J].
Fitoussi, Alfred D. ;
Berry, M. G. ;
Couturaud, Benoit ;
Falcou, Marie-Christine ;
Salmon, Remy J. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 125 (03) :783-791
[6]   Lumpectomy vs oncoplastic surgery for breast-conserving therapy of cancer. A prospective study about 99 patients [J].
Giacalone, PL ;
Roger, P ;
Dubon, O ;
El Gareh, N ;
Daurs, JP ;
Laffargue, F .
ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE, 2006, 131 (04) :256-261
[7]   Cosmetic Outcomes and Complications Reported by Patients Having Undergone Breast-Conserving Treatment [J].
Hill-Kayser, Christine E. ;
Vachani, Carolyn ;
Hampshire, Margaret K. ;
Di Lullo, Gloria A. ;
Metz, James M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (03) :839-844
[8]   Impact of radiotherapy on breast reconstruction [J].
Jugenburg, Martin ;
Disa, Joseph J. ;
Pusic, Andrea L. ;
Cordeiro, Peter G. .
CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2007, 34 (01) :29-+
[9]   Comparative study of surgical margins in oncoplastic surgery and quadrantectomy in breast cancer [J].
Kaur, N ;
Petit, JY ;
Rietjens, M ;
Maffini, F ;
Luini, A ;
Gatti, G ;
Rey, PC ;
Urban, C ;
De Lorenzi, F .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 12 (07) :539-545
[10]   Radiation Therapy and Breast Reconstruction: A Critical Review of the Literature [J].
Kronowitz, Steven J. ;
Robb, Geoffrey L. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 124 (02) :395-408