SMS versus voice messaging to deliver MNCH communication in rural Malawi: assessment of delivery success and user experience

被引:50
作者
Crawford, Jessica [1 ]
Larsen-Cooper, Erin [2 ]
Jezman, Zachariah [1 ]
Cunningham, Stacey C. [2 ]
Bancroft, Emily [2 ]
机构
[1] VillageReach, Balaka, Malawi
[2] VillageReach, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
D O I
10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00155
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the difference in delivery success of health messages delivered through pushed SMS, pushed voice messages sent to personal phones, and voice messages retrieved from a community phone ("retrieved voice messaging''), as well as the difference in quality of the user experience. Methods: We analyzed the project's electronic monitoring data between September 2011 and June 2013, including demographics, enrollment data, and messages sent and successfully delivered. We also collected and analyzed information from quarterly phone-based surveys with users to assess quality of the user experience, including acceptability, comprehension, new information learned, and reported behavior change. Results: More than half of subscribers enrolled in the retrieved voice messaging service while nearly one-third enrolled in the pushed SMS service and less than 10% in pushed voice messaging. Message delivery success was highest among pushed SMS subscribers and lowest among retrieved voice subscribers. Overall, 99% of survey respondents reported trusting messages they received, and about 75% of respondents recalled the last message they received and learned something new. Almost 75% of respondents reported that they had already changed or intended to change their behavior based on received messages. Intended or actual behavior change was significantly higher among pushed SMS enrollees than among pushed or retrieved voice messaging enrollees (P=.01). Conclusion: All message modalities led to high levels of satisfaction, comprehension, and new information learned. Due to lower cost, higher delivery success, and higher levels of intended or actual behavior change, SMS is the preferred delivery modality. However, the majority of users included in this study did not have access to a personal phone, and retrieved voice messages provided an opportunity to access a population that otherwise could not be served. Providing multiple methods by which users could access the service was crucial in extending reach beyond literate personal phone owners.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 46
页数:12
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Text Messaging as a Tool for Behavior Change in Disease Prevention and Management [J].
Cole-Lewis, Heather ;
Kershaw, Trace .
EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS, 2010, 32 (01) :56-69
[2]   Interest of pregnant women in the use of SMS (short message service) text messages for the improvement of perinatal and postnatal care [J].
Cormick, Gabriela ;
Kim, Natalie A. ;
Rodgers, Ashlei ;
Gibbons, Luz ;
Buekens, Pierre M. ;
Belizan, Jose M. ;
Althabe, Fernando .
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2012, 9
[3]   Pilot evaluation of the text4baby mobile health program [J].
Evans, William Douglas ;
Wallace, Jasmine L. ;
Snider, Jeremy .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 12
[4]   The effectiveness of M-health technologies for improving health and health services: A systematic review protocol [J].
Free C. ;
Phillips G. ;
Felix L. ;
Galli L. ;
Patel V. ;
Edwards P. .
BMC Research Notes, 3 (1)
[5]  
Free C, 2013, PLOS MED, V10, DOI [10.1371/journal.pmed.1001363, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001362]
[6]  
Grameen Foundation, 2012, MOBILE TECHNOLOGY CO
[7]   Electronic reminders for cancer prevention: Factors associated with preference for automated voice reminders or text messages [J].
Greaney, Mary L. ;
Puleo, Elaine ;
Sprunck-Harrild, Kim ;
Bennett, Gary G. ;
Cunningham, Moira A. ;
Gillman, Matthew W. ;
Coeling, Molly ;
Emmons, Karen M. .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 55 (02) :151-154
[8]  
GSMA Mobile for Development Intelligence (MDI), 2013, VAL VOIC UNS OPP
[9]  
GSMA Mobile for Development Intelligence (MDI), 2013, SCALING MOBILE DEV D
[10]  
Invest in Knowledge, 2012, BASEL REP EV INDF CO