PROPOFOL - EFFECTIVE DOSE AND INDUCTION CHARACTERISTICS IN UNPREMEDICATED CHILDREN

被引:88
作者
HANNALLAH, RS
BAKER, SB
CASEY, W
MCGILL, WA
BROADMAN, LM
NORDEN, JM
机构
[1] CHILDRENS NATL MED CTR,DEPT PEDIAT,WASHINGTON,DC
[2] GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIV,MED CTR,WASHINGTON,DC 20037
关键词
ANESTHETICS; INTRAVENOUS-PROPOFOL; ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES-INDUCTION; ANESTHESIA; PEDIATRIC;
D O I
10.1097/00000542-199102000-00004
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The induction dose, induction characteristics, and cardiovascular and respiratory effects of propofol were studied in 90 unpremedicated children 3-12 yr old. Propofol in a dose of 1-3 mg.kg-1 was injected in an antecubital vein over 10-30 s. Successful induction was defined by loss of eyelash reflex occurring within 50 s of the conclusion of propofol injection and followed by subsequent acceptance of face mask without excessive movement. The effective dose of propofol resulting in loss of eyelash reflex in 50% (ED50) and 95% (ED95) of children were 1.3 (1.1-1.4) and 2.0 (1.7-2.6) mg.kg-1 (95% confidence interval). The corresponding ED50 and ED95 for a successful induction that included acceptance of face mask were 1.5 (1.3-1.7) and 2.3 (2.1-3.0), respectively. There was a 6.6% incidence of mild to moderate pain on injection and a 12.7% incidence of involuntary movement. Apnea (cessation of breathing > 20 s) was seen in 21% of patients. Blood pressure decreased by more than 20% of baseline value in 48% of patients who received halothane (1-3%) after the bolus injection of propofol. It is concluded that propofol is an effective induction agent in children. A dose of 2.5-3.0 mg.kg-1 is recommended to ensure a smooth transition to an inhalational maintenance technique. The use of antecubital veins is associated with a low incidence of pain on injection.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 219
页数:3
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   DOSE REQUIREMENTS OF ICI 35,868 (PROPOFOL, DIPRIVAN) IN A NEW FORMULATION FOR INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA [J].
CUMMINGS, GC ;
DIXON, J ;
KAY, NH ;
WINDSOR, JPW ;
MAJOR, E ;
MORGAN, M ;
SEAR, JW ;
SPENCE, AA ;
STEPHENSON, DK .
ANAESTHESIA, 1984, 39 (12) :1168-1171
[2]   THE EFFECTS OF SPEED OF INJECTION ON INDUCTION WITH PROPOFOL - A COMPARISON WITH ETOMIDATE [J].
GILLIES, GWA ;
LEES, NW .
ANAESTHESIA, 1989, 44 (05) :386-388
[3]  
GREGORY GA, 1989, PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, P547
[4]   PROPOFOL VERSUS THIOPENTAL FOR OUTPATIENT ANESTHESIA [J].
JOHNSTON, R ;
NOSEWORTHY, T ;
ANDERSON, B ;
KONOPAD, E ;
GRACE, M .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1987, 67 (03) :431-433
[5]   COMPARISON OF INDUCTION CHARACTERISTICS OF 4 INTRAVENOUS ANESTHETIC AGENTS [J].
MCCOLLUM, JSC ;
DUNDEE, JW .
ANAESTHESIA, 1986, 41 (10) :995-1000
[6]   INDUCTION CHARACTERISTICS OF PROPOFOL IN CHILDREN - COMPARISON WITH THIOPENTONE [J].
MIRAKHUR, RK .
ANAESTHESIA, 1988, 43 (07) :593-598
[7]   PROPOFOL FOR INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA IN CHILDREN - A COMPARISON WITH THIOPENTONE AND HALOTHANE INHALATIONAL INDUCTION [J].
MORTON, NS ;
WEE, M ;
CHRISTIE, G ;
GRAY, IG ;
GRANT, IS .
ANAESTHESIA, 1988, 43 (05) :350-355
[8]   INDUCTION DOSE OF PROPOFOL IN CHILDREN [J].
PATEL, DK ;
KEELING, PA ;
NEWMAN, GB ;
RADFORD, P .
ANAESTHESIA, 1988, 43 (11) :949-952
[9]   COMPARISON OF THE INDUCTION CHARACTERISTICS OF THIOPENTONE AND PROPOFOL IN CHILDREN [J].
PURCELLJONES, G ;
YATES, A ;
BAKER, JR ;
JAMES, IG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1987, 59 (11) :1431-1436
[10]   COMPARISON BETWEEN PROPOFOL AND THIOPENTONE FOR INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA IN CHILDREN [J].
VALTONEN, M ;
IISALO, E ;
KANTO, J ;
TIKKANEN, J .
ANAESTHESIA, 1988, 43 (08) :696-699