EVOKED-POTENTIAL WAVEFORM DIFFERENCES PRODUCED BY PERCEPTION OF DIFFERENT MEANINGS OF AN AMBIGUOUS PHRASE

被引:37
作者
BROWN, WS
MARSH, JT
SMITH, JC
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES, DEPT PSYCHIAT, LOS ANGELES, CA 90024 USA
[2] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES, INST BRAIN RES, LOS ANGELES, CA 90024 USA
来源
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY | 1976年 / 41卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0013-4694(76)90039-0
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
To test the effects of perceived linguistic meaning on evoked potential (EP) waveform, an experiment was performed using the stimulus homophone "led" or "lead" in the single ambiguous phrase "it was/''led/". The phrase was presented aurally in sets of 60 repetitions, instructing the subject before each set as to the specific meaning of the stimulus word to be perceived. Averages of 100 responses were obtained for each of the 2 meanings of the stimulus. Responses were recorded from scalp locations over Broca''s and Wernicke''s areas and homologous right hemisphere loci. Average waveforms evoked by the 2 meanings of the stimulus word were dissimilar for the left anterior locus and similar for the other three loci as indicated by correlations. The application of the Discrimination Index to these data disclosed that the EP waveform differences observed at the left anterior locus could not be attributed to random variability. Stepwise Discriminant Function Analysis on the same data revealed that responses from individual subjects could be classified according to experimental conditions at a greater-than-chance level. Discrimination was best for responses from left hemisphere loci. There was some commonality of discriminative EP components across subjects, specifically components late in the EP epoch. These data demonstrated an EP correlate of the processing of the contextual meaning of words.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 123
页数:11
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   CONTEXTUAL MEANING EFFECTS ON SPEECH-EVOKED POTENTIALS [J].
BROWN, WS ;
MARSH, JT ;
SMITH, JC .
BEHAVIORAL BIOLOGY, 1973, 9 (06) :755-761
[2]   HEMISPHERIC DIFFERENCES IN EVOKED POTENTIALS TO VERBAL AND NONVERBAL STIMULI IN LEFT AND RIGHT VISUAL FIELDS [J].
BUCHSBAUM, M ;
FEDIO, P .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1970, 5 (02) :207-+
[3]  
CALLAWAY E, 1970, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V29, P421, DOI 10.1016/0013-4694(70)90059-3
[4]   EFFECTS OF CARDIAC AND RESPIRATORY CYCLES ON AVERAGED VISUAL EVOKED RESPONSES [J].
CALLAWAY, E ;
BUCHSBAUM, M .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1965, 19 (05) :476-+
[5]  
CHAPMAN RM, 1974, INT S CEREBRAL EVOKE, P43
[6]  
DIXON WF, 1970, BMD COMPUTER PROGRAM
[7]   AUDITORY EVOKED POTENTIAL VARIABILITY IN SCHIZOPHRENIA .2. APPLICATION OF DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS [J].
DONCHIN, E ;
CALLAWAY, E ;
JONES, RT .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1970, 29 (05) :429-&
[8]   SIMULATION STUDY OF EFFICACY OF STEPWISE DISCRIMINANT-ANALYSIS IN DETECTION AND COMPARISON OF EVENT RELATED POTENTIALS [J].
DONCHIN, E ;
HERNING, RI .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1975, 38 (01) :51-68
[9]  
MARSH JT, RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
[10]   EFFECT OF ATTENTION ON AVERAGE EVOKED RESPONSE TO SPEECH SOUNDS [J].
ROTH, WT ;
KOPELL, BS ;
BERTOZZI, PE .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1970, 29 (01) :38-&