IMPACT OF PRENATAL TESTING ON MATERNAL-FETAL BONDING - CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING VERSUS AMNIOCENTESIS

被引:46
|
作者
CACCIA, N
JOHNSON, JM
ROBINSON, GE
BARNA, T
机构
[1] UNIV TORONTO,DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL,DIV MATERNAL FETAL MED,200 ELIZABETH ST,6EN-216,TORONTO M5G 2C4,ONTARIO,CANADA
[2] UNIV TORONTO,DEPT PSYCHIAT,TORONTO M5S 1A1,ONTARIO,CANADA
关键词
MATERNAL-FETAL BONDING; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING; AMNIOCENTESIS;
D O I
10.1016/0002-9378(91)90484-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The process of maternal-fetal attachment, considered vital for normal infant development, begins during pregnancy and can be affected by a number of external factors. In this study the impact of prenatal testing on maternal-fetal bonding was evaluated in 253 women undergoing either first-trimester chorionic villus sampling (n = 101) or second-trimester genetic amniocentesis (n = 152). The women were evaluated by means of a modification of the Cranley Maternal-Fetal Attachment Scale, administered before and after the results of the prenatal diagnostic testing were made known to them (mean gestational ages of 10.6 and 15.7 weeks for the chorionic villus sampling group and 16.5 and 21.1 weeks for the amniocentesis group). The results showed: (1) that maternal-fetal attachment begins as early as 10 weeks' gestation and increases significantly as the pregnancy progresses, (2) that maternal-fetal attachment increases significantly, once the results are known to be normal, for both groups (p < 0.001), (3) that this increase occurs about 5 weeks earlier for patients with chorionic villus sampling in comparison to those undergoing amniocentesis (p < 0.001). Thus, with regard to the process of maternal-fetal attachment, first-trimester chorionic villus sampling appears to be preferable to second-trimester amniocentesis.
引用
收藏
页码:1122 / 1125
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Fetal loss after amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling in Iceland
    Haraldsdottir, Kristin Rut
    Gottfredsdottir, Helga
    Geirsson, Reynir Tomas
    LAEKNABLADID, 2014, 100 (03): : 147 - 151
  • [12] How painful are amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling?
    Csaba, A
    Bush, MC
    Saphier, C
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2006, 26 (01) : 35 - 38
  • [13] Risk of Fetal Loss in Pregnancies Undergoing Midtrimester Amniocentesis after Inconclusive Chorionic Villus Sampling
    Salsi, Ginevra
    Grati, Francesca Romana
    Bellussi, Federica
    Pompilii, Eva
    Maggi, Federico
    Simoni, Giuseppe
    D'Ambrosi, Francesco
    Orsi, Michele
    Gentile, Mattia
    Rembouskos, Georgios
    Zuliani, Guglielmo
    Volpe, Paolo
    Pilu, Gianluigi
    FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2019, 46 (03) : 149 - 152
  • [14] SAMPLING SUCCESS AND RISK BY TRANSABDOMINAL CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING, TRANSCERVICAL CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING AND AMNIOCENTESIS - A RANDOMIZED STUDY
    SMIDTJENSEN, S
    PERMIN, M
    PHILIP, J
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 1 (02) : 86 - 90
  • [15] FETAL LOSS RATE AFTER CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING AND SUBSEQUENT AMNIOCENTESIS
    BRANDENBURG, H
    JAHODA, MGJ
    PIJPERS, L
    REUSS, A
    KLEYER, WJ
    WLADIMIROFF, JW
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1990, 35 (02): : 178 - 180
  • [16] Chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: what are the risks in current practice?
    Papp, C
    Papp, Z
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 15 (02) : 159 - 165
  • [17] Revisiting the challenges of training Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows in chorionic villus sampling
    Suskin, Barrie G.
    Sciscione, Anthony M.
    Teigen, Nickolas
    Jenkins, Thomas C.
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    Gregg, Anthony R.
    Gross, Susan J.
    Bajaj, Komal
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 215 (06) : 777.e1 - 777.e4
  • [18] Second-trimester amniocentesis vs. chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis in multiple gestations
    Antsaklis, A
    Souka, AP
    Daskalakis, G
    Kavalakis, Y
    Michalas, S
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 20 (05) : 476 - 481
  • [19] Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling in twin gestations: which is the best sampling technique?
    Simonazzi, Giuliana
    Curti, Alessandra
    Farina, Antonio
    Pilu, Gianluigi
    Bovicelli, Luciano
    Rizzo, Nicola
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 202 (04) : 365.e1 - 365.e5
  • [20] SINGLE-CENTER COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF 1000 PRENATAL DIAGNOSES WITH CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING AND 1000 DIAGNOSES WITH AMNIOCENTESIS
    YOUNG, SR
    SHIPLEY, CF
    WADE, RV
    EDWARDS, JG
    WATERS, MB
    CANTU, ML
    BEST, RG
    DENNIS, EJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 165 (02) : 255 - 263