Clinical Evaluation of the Efficacy of Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminium Garnet (Nd:YAG) Laser Therapy and Sensikin (R) in Treatment of Dentine Hypersensitivity

被引:0
作者
Abed, Ahmad Moghareh [1 ]
Naghsh, Narges [1 ]
Birang, Reza [1 ]
Shafiei, Fatemeh [2 ]
Seifi, Massoud [2 ]
Yaghini, Jaber [1 ]
机构
[1] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Torabinejad Dent Res Ctr, Sch Dent, Dept Periodontol, Esfahan, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Laser Applicat Med Sci Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
关键词
dentine hypersensitivity; Nd: YAG laser; laser therapy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction:Dentine hypersensitivity (DH) is characterized by a short sharp pain arising from the exposed dentine, in response to a thermal, evaporative, tactile, osmotic or chemical stimulus. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Nd:YAG laser therapy and desensitizing gel (Sensikin (R), Laboratorios Kin S.A., Barcelona, Spain) in treatment of dentine hypersensitivity. Methods:A total of 20 patients with at least 6 hypersensitive teeth were selected and divided randomly into three groups:Nd:YAG laser (10 HZ, 1W, 60 S, two times) treated group, Sensikin r treated group and a control group. Subjects were asked to apply the gel at home for the next week and 3 times a day as they were instructed. Assessment of the pain was performed by visual analyzing scale (VAS) after stimulation of the teeth by compressed air at 6 intervals:before treatment, immediately after treatment, one week, one, three and six months later. The data obtained were analyzed using the SPSS software, one way ANOVA and repeated measurement ANOVA tests. Results:VAS scores did not show any significant differences between the three groups prior to treatment (P value> 0.05), but in all groups after treatment VAS scores differed significantly in comparison to VAS scores before treatment (Pvalue< 0.05). This statistically significant difference in the control group demonstrated a placebo effect. However, the efficacy between the three groups was not significantly different. An overall comparison indicated no significant differences at various time intervals. Conclusion:Nd:YAG laser and desensitizing gel effectively reduce DH. However, we found no significant statistical differences between these two groups compared with the control group.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 66
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Addy M, 1994, Curr Opin Periodontol, P71
[2]  
Aranha Ana Cecilia Corrêa, 2009, Braz. oral res., V23, P333, DOI 10.1590/S1806-83242009000300018
[4]   Comparative evaluation of the effects of Nd:YAG and Er:YAG laser in dentin hypersensitivity treatment [J].
Birang, Reza ;
Poursamimi, Jamshid ;
Gutknecht, Norbert ;
Lampert, Friedrich ;
Mir, Maziar .
LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 22 (01) :21-24
[5]  
Brannstrom M., 1963, SENSORY MECH DENTINE, P73
[6]   Aetiology, prevalence and clinical features of cervical dentine sensitivity [J].
Chabanski, MB ;
Gillam, DG .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1997, 24 (01) :15-19
[7]   Clinical evaluation of cervical dentine sensitivity in a population of patients referred to a specialist periodontology department: a pilot study [J].
Chabanski, MB ;
Gillam, DG ;
Bulman, JS ;
Newman, HN .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1997, 24 (09) :666-672
[9]   PREVALENCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF CERVICAL DENTIN HYPERSENSITIVITY IN A POPULATION IN RIO-DE-JANEIRO, BRAZIL [J].
FISCHER, C ;
FISCHER, RG ;
WENNBERG, A .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1992, 20 (05) :272-276
[10]   THE INCIDENCE OF HYPERSENSITIVE TEETH IN THE WEST OF SCOTLAND [J].
FLYNN, J ;
GALLOWAY, R ;
ORCHARDSON, R .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1985, 13 (03) :230-236