Usefulness of a Combined Approach of T1-Weighted, T2-Weighted, Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced, and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Prostate Cancer

被引:11
作者
Dal Min, Byung [1 ]
Kim, Won Tae [1 ]
Cho, Bum Sang [2 ]
Kim, Yong-June [1 ]
Yun, Seok Joong [1 ]
Lee, Sang-Cheol [1 ]
Kim, Wun-Jae [1 ]
机构
[1] Chungbuk Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Urol, Cheongju, South Korea
[2] Chungbuk Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Cheongju, South Korea
关键词
Diagnosis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostatic neoplasms;
D O I
10.4111/kju.2012.53.12.830
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We evaluated the value of a combined approach of T1-weighted (T1W) imaging, T2-weighted (T2W) imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for the detection of prostate cancer and extracapsular extension (ECE) in patients with prostate cancer by using pathologic data after radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: From April 2009 to December 2011, 126 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy and prostate MRI for prostate cancer were analyzed retrospectively. The MRI findings were compared with the pathologic findings of the radical prostatectomy specimens in each patient. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the detection of prostate cancer and extracapsular extension were analyzed. Results: The prostate cancer detection rate by use of T1W and T2W imaging, DCE-MRI, and their combination was 65.1%, 69.0%, and 80.2%, respectively (p=0.023). The detection rate using T1W and T2W imaging, DCE-MRI, DWI, and their combination was 57.7%, 65.4%, 67.3%, and 80.8%, respectively (p=0.086). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of combination MRI (T1W, T2W, and DCE-MRI) for ECE were 46.4%, 91.4%, 83.9%, and 68.1%, respectively. The sensitivity of combination MRI (T1W, T2W, and DCE-MRI) for ECE tended to increase as the prostate-specific antigen level rose (p=0.010). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of combination MRI (T1W, T2W, DCE-MRI, and DWI) for ECE were 65.0%, 87.5%, 76.5%, and 80.0%, respectively. Conclusions: A combined approach of T1W, T2W, and DCE-MRI with DWI demonstrated an accurate detection rate of prostate cancer. Also, combination approaches showed a high specificity for predicting ECE, although sensitivity was relatively lower. Therefore, these methods are reliable for predicting prostate cancer. However, a new protocol is necessary to enhance the sensitivity for predicting ECE.
引用
收藏
页码:830 / 835
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Correlation of transrectal ultrasound, computer analysis of transrectal ultrasound and histopathology of radical prostatectomy specimen [J].
Beerlage, HP ;
Aarnink, RG ;
Ruijter, ET ;
Witjes, JA ;
Wijkstra, H ;
van de Kaa, CA ;
Debruyne, FMJ ;
de la Rosette, JJMCH .
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2001, 4 (01) :56-62
[2]   Prostate cancer: Accurate determination of extracapsular extension with high-spatial-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MR imaging - Initial results [J].
Bloch, B. Nicolas ;
Furman-Haran, Edna ;
Helbich, Thomas H. ;
Lenkinski, Robert E. ;
Degani, Hadassa ;
Kratzik, Christian ;
Susani, Martin ;
Haitel, Andrea ;
Jaromi, Silvia ;
Ngo, Long ;
Rofsky, Neil M. .
RADIOLOGY, 2007, 245 (01) :176-185
[3]   Prediction of prostate cancer extracapsular extension with high spatial resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced 3-T MRI [J].
Bloch, B. Nicolas ;
Genega, Elizabeth M. ;
Costa, Daniel N. ;
Pedrosa, Ivan ;
Smith, Martin P. ;
Kressel, Herbert Y. ;
Ngo, Long ;
Sanda, Martin G. ;
DeWolf, William C. ;
Rofsky, Neil M. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (10) :2201-2210
[4]   Pretreatment evaluation of prostate cancer:: Role of MR imaging and 1H MR spectroscopy [J].
Claus, FG ;
Hricak, H ;
Hattery, RR .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2004, 24 :S167-S180
[5]   Discrimination of prostate cancer from normal peripheral zone and central gland tissue by using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging [J].
Engelbrecht, MR ;
Huisman, HJ ;
Laheij, RJF ;
Jager, GJ ;
van Leenders, GJLH ;
Hulsbergen-Van De Kaa, CA ;
de la Rosette, JJMCH ;
Blickman, JG ;
Barentsz, JO .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 229 (01) :248-254
[6]   Imaging prostate cancer: A multidisciplinary perspective [J].
Hricak, Hedvig ;
Choyke, Peter L. ;
Eberhardt, Steven C. ;
Leibel, Steven A. ;
Scardino, Peter T. .
RADIOLOGY, 2007, 243 (01) :28-53
[7]   Complications and Functional Results of Surgery for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer [J].
Joniau, S. G. ;
Van Baelen, A. A. ;
Hsu, C. Y. ;
Van Poppel, H. P. .
ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2012, 2012
[8]   Effect of Prostate Biopsy Hemorrhage on MRDW and MRS Imaging [J].
Lee, Jong Yeon ;
Chang, In Ho ;
Moon, Young Tae ;
Do Kim, Kyung ;
Myung, Soon Chul ;
Kim, Tae Hyoung ;
Lee, Jong Beum .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 52 (10) :674-680
[9]   Leveling of prostate cancer mortality in western Europe [J].
Levi, F ;
Lucchini, F ;
Negri, E ;
Boyle, P ;
La Vecchia, C .
PROSTATE, 2004, 60 (01) :46-52
[10]   Locally advanced prostate cancer: a population-based study of treatment patterns [J].
Lowrance, William T. ;
Elkin, Elena B. ;
Yee, David S. ;
Feifer, Andrew ;
Ehdaie, Behfar ;
Jacks, Lindsay M. ;
Atoria, Coral L. ;
Zelefsky, Michael J. ;
Scher, Howard I. ;
Scardino, Peter T. ;
Eastham, James A. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 (09) :1309-1314