Modeling the non-linear behaviour of option price deviations from the Black Scholes model

被引:0
作者
Gregoriou, Andros [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ East Anglia, Norwich Business Sch, Norwich, Norfolk, England
关键词
Options markets; Pricing; Transaction costs; Economic models;
D O I
10.1108/01443581011012243
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to test for and model non-linearities in option price deviations from the Black Scholes (BS) model in FTSE 100 index options over the time period 1997-2006. Design/methodology/approach - The economic specification and estimation methodology is outlined, the data are discussed, and the empirical results are analysed. Findings - The tests reject the linearity hypothesis and the paper shows that the exponential smooth transition autoregressive model is capable of capturing the non-linear behaviour of option price misalignments. The paper finds that even though FTSE 100 index options are heavily traded, transaction costs prevent rapid adjustments of option prices from their "optimal" value. Originality/value - The paper presents new empirical evidence, which explicitly allows for the possibility that option price misalignments from the BS price can be characterised by a non-linear mean reverting process.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / +
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Pricing and hedging long-term options [J].
Bakshi, G ;
Cao, C ;
Chen, ZW .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2000, 94 (1-2) :277-318
[2]   PRICING OF OPTIONS AND CORPORATE LIABILITIES [J].
BLACK, F ;
SCHOLES, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1973, 81 (03) :637-654
[3]  
CHAPUT JS, 2003, J DERIV, V10, P70
[4]  
Davidson R, 1993, ESTIMATION INFERENCE, V1
[5]   Testing for unit roots: What should students be taught? [J].
Elder, J ;
Kennedy, PE .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC EDUCATION, 2001, 32 (02) :137-146
[6]   Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root [J].
Elliott, G ;
Rothenberg, TJ ;
Stock, JH .
ECONOMETRICA, 1996, 64 (04) :813-836
[7]  
Fleming J, 1996, J FUTURES MARKETS, V16, P353, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9934(199606)16:4<353::AID-FUT1>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-H
[9]  
Gelder L. V, 2006, 106 DNB
[10]  
Gregoriou A., 2007, J ECON STUD, V35, P191