Comparison of surface roughness measurements by stylus profiler, AFM and non-contact optical profiler

被引:352
|
作者
Poon, CY
Bhushan, B
机构
[1] Computer Microtribology and Contamination Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus
关键词
comparison of surface profilers; stylus size; scan size; sampling interval; glass-ceramic thin film disk substrate;
D O I
10.1016/0043-1648(95)06697-7
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Surface roughness measurements were performed on a glass-ceramic disk substrate by stylus profiler (SP), atomic force microscope (AFM) and non-contact optical profiler (NOP). Results of surface measurements are presented and the differences between SP, AFM and NOP roughness measurements are discussed. The effects of stylus size, scan size and sampling interval on roughness parameters are investigated. The methodology of choosing the scan size and sampling interval is suggested. AFM is concluded to be the most suitable surface measuring instrument for roughness measurement on the glass-ceramic substrate. If SP is used to make the measurement, the tip radius should be in the order of 0.2 mu m. However, localized damage to the test surface may occur owing to high contact stress. NOP using an objective magnification of 40 or lower is not recommended because the glass-ceramic substrate contains submicron roughness.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 88
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of optical surface roughness measured by stylus profiler, AFM and white light interferometer using power spectral density
    Chen Jianchao
    Sun Tao
    Wang Jinghe
    5TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCED OPTICAL MANUFACTURING AND TESTING TECHNOLOGIES: OPTICAL TEST AND MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY AND EQUIPMENT, 2010, 7656
  • [2] A micrometric non-contact profiler for optical quality surfaces
    Royo, S
    Arasa, J
    Caum, J
    MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 12 (01) : 89 - 96
  • [3] Use of non-contact resistivity measurements for epitaxy: Surface charge profiler method
    Danel, A
    Tardif, F
    Kamarinos, G
    Nguyen, MC
    HIGH PURITY SILICON V, 1998, 98 (13): : 444 - 455
  • [4] TIS, AFM, Interferometry & Optical Profiler correlation of surface roughness on silicon wafers
    Taylor, PA
    Dawson, DJ
    SURFACE CHARACTERIZATION FOR COMPUTER DISKS, WAFERS, AND FLAT PANEL DISPLAYS, 1999, 3619 : 128 - 134
  • [5] A NEW 3-DIMENSIONAL NON-CONTACT DIGITAL OPTICAL PROFILER
    BHUSHAN, B
    WYANT, JC
    MEILING, J
    WEAR, 1988, 122 (03) : 301 - 312
  • [6] Non-contact high-precision surface three dimensional profiler
    Jiang, JF
    He, YH
    Zhao, WS
    ROUGH SURFACE SCATTERING AND CONTAMINATION, 1999, 3784 : 362 - 369
  • [7] In situ non-contact measurements of surface roughness
    Quinsat, Yann
    Tournier, Christophe
    PRECISION ENGINEERING-JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETIES FOR PRECISION ENGINEERING AND NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2012, 36 (01): : 97 - 103
  • [8] Dynamic surface roughness profiler
    Kimbrough, Brad
    Brock, Neal
    Millerd, James
    ADVANCES IN METROLOGY FOR X-RAY AND EUV OPTICS IV, 2012, 8501
  • [9] Dynamic surface roughness profiler
    Kimbrough, Brad
    Brock, Neal
    Millerd, James
    OPTICAL MANUFACTURING AND TESTING IX, 2011, 8126
  • [10] In situ measurements of snow surface roughness using a laser profiler
    Lacroix, P.
    Legresy, B.
    Langley, K.
    Hamran, S. E.
    Kohler, J.
    Roques, S.
    Remy, F.
    Dechambre, M.
    JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY, 2008, 54 (187) : 753 - 762