Sign language, translation and rule of law - deaf people's experiences from encounters with the Norwegian criminal justice system

被引:2
作者
Olsen, Terje [1 ]
Kermit, Patrick [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Nordland Res Inst, Bodo, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Social Work & Hlth Sci, Trondheim, Norway
[3] NTNU Social Res, Trondheim, Norway
关键词
deaf; disability; sign language; rule of law; criminal justice;
D O I
10.1080/15017419.2014.972448
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities was ratified in Norway, June 2013. Nordic countries are generally associated with the promotion of human rights as well as disability rights. The Rule of Law Index from the World Justice Project ranks the Nordic countries among the top nations when it comes to high standards of justice (both civil and criminal justice) and rule of law. However, there are also well-known examples of grave miscarriages of justice in cases where disabled people have been involved. These cases address issues of access to justice and questions barriers to effective communication in criminal justice. Taking the situation of deaf people in Norway as a case, this study asks what barriers deaf people face when reporting a crime, being accused of a crime or being a witness in court. The methodological approach is semi-structured, open-ended interviews with deaf persons, professional sign language interpreters, judges, prosecutors, police officers and lawyers. All the informants have personal experiences from encounters between deaf people and the criminal justice system. This paper discusses this situation in terms of language and communication problems, access to justice, non-discrimination and equal recognition before the law.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 41
页数:19
相关论文
共 36 条
[11]  
Grovdal Y., 2013, MELLON FRIHET BESKYT
[12]   COMMENT: SNOWBALL VERSUS RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING [J].
Heckathorn, Douglas D. .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY 2011, VOL 41, 2011, 41 :355-366
[13]   Mediating zones of uncertainty - Interpreter agency, the interpreting habitus and political asylum adjudication [J].
Inghilleri, Moira .
TRANSLATOR, 2005, 11 (01) :69-85
[14]  
Kermit P., 2011, DISABILITY STUDIES Q, V31
[15]   Deaf or deaf? Questioning alleged antinomies in the bioethical discourses on cochlear implantation and suggesting an alternative approach to d/Deafness [J].
Kermit, Patrick .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2009, 11 (02) :159-174
[16]   UNDERSTANDING DEAFHOOD: IN SEARCH OF ITS MEANINGS [J].
Kusters, Annelies ;
De Meulder, Maartje .
AMERICAN ANNALS OF THE DEAF, 2013, 157 (05) :428-438
[17]  
Kvam M. H., 2001, SEKSUELLE OVERGREP M
[18]   Sexual abuse of deaf children. A retrospective analysis of the prevalence and characteristics of childhood sexual abuse among deaf adults in Norway [J].
Kvam, MH .
CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 2004, 28 (03) :241-251
[19]   Is sexual abuse of children with disabilities disclosed? A retrospective analysis of child disability and the likelihood of sexual abuse among those attending Norwegian hospitals [J].
Kvam, MH .
CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 2000, 24 (08) :1073-1084
[20]  
Ladd P., 2003, UNDERSTING DEAF C