Quality management framework for evaluating academic libraries in Kenya

被引：0

作者：

Odera-Kwach, Beatrice A. ^{[1
,2
]}

Ngulube, Patrick ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ South Africa, Dept Informat Sci, Pretoria, South Africa

[2] Univ South Africa, Sch Grad Studies, Pretoria, South Africa

来源：

SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF LIBRARIES AND INFORMATION SCIENCE | 2011年 / 77卷 / 02期

关键词：

Impact assessment; performance measurement; performance criteria; performance indicators; outcome assessment; Kenya;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];

学科分类号：

1205 ; 120501 ;

摘要：

The purpose of this study was to identify the performance measurements used for the evaluation of quality in Kenyan university libraries, with the aim of determining the perceptions of university librarians towards performance measurement. The study established that the majority of the university librarians considered 25 of the 26 performance indicators important. More than 60% of them considered 11 of the 20 performance indicators very important. The study recommends the use of nine performance criteria and 26 indicators for the evaluation of the quality of university libraries.

引用

页码：116 / 124

页数：9

共 38 条

[1] Ambrozic M., 2003, Performance Measurement and Metrics, V4, P64, DOI 10.1108/14678040310486909
[2] American Library Association (ALA), 2004, STAND LIBR HIGH ED
[3] American Library Association (ALA), 1998, TASK FORC AC LIB OUT
[4] [Anonymous], 2011, SA J LIBS INFO SCI, V77
[5] Telling the story Qualitative approaches to measuring the performance of emerging library services
Brophy, Peter
[J]. PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT AND METRICS, 2008, 9 (01) : 7 - 17
[6] Creswell J. W., 2015, CONCISE INTRO MIXED
[7] Cullen R., 2001, P 4 NOR INT C PER ME
[8] Understanding Accreditation: The Librarians Role in Educational Evaluation
Dalrymple, Prudence W.
[J]. PORTAL-LIBRARIES AND THE ACADEMY, 2001, 1 (01) : 23 - 32
[9] Derfert-Wolf L., 2005, P WORLD LIB INF C 71
[10] Outcomes assessment: Not synonymous with inputs and outputs
Dugan, RE
Hernon, P
[J]. JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP, 2002, 28 (06) : 376 - 380

← 1 2 3 4 →