BAYESIAN-ANALYSIS WITH LIMITED COMMUNICATION

被引:9
作者
BERGER, JO
MORTERA, J
机构
[1] PURDUE UNIV,DEPT STAT,W LAFAYETTE,IN 47907
[2] UNIV ROME LA SAPIENZA,DIPARTIMENTO STAT PROBABIL & STAT APPL,I-00185 ROME,ITALY
关键词
LIMITED COMMUNICATION; BAYESIAN SUFFICIENCY; COMBINING INFORMATION; LINEAR OPINION POOLS; KULLBACK-LEIBLER DISTANCE; THE TEAM PROBLEM; RELIABILITY DEMONSTRATION;
D O I
10.1016/0378-3758(91)90055-J
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
The i-th member of a group of m individuals (or stations) observes a random quantity X(i), where X = (X(l),...,X(m) has density g(x\theta). Each individual can report only y(i) = h(i)(x(i)), because of a limitation on the amount of information that can be communicated. Based on y = (y(l),...,y(m)) and a prior distribution pi(theta), Bayesian inference or decision concerning theta is to be undertaken. The first version of this problem that will be studied is the 'team' problem, where the m individuals form a team with common prior pi and the reports, y(i), are the posterior distributions of each team member. We compare the optimal Bayesian posterior for this problem (pi(theta\y)) with previous suggestions, such as the optimal linear opinion pool. The second facet of the problem that is explored is that of choosing y to optimize the information communicated, subject to a constraint on the amount of information that can be communicated. In particular, we will consider the dichotomous case, in which each y(i) can be only 0 or 1, and will illustrate the optimal choice of y(i) for both inference and decision criteria. The inference criterion considered will be closeness of the posteriors pi(theta\x) and pi(theta\y), in an expected Kullback-Leibler sense, while the decision criterion considered will be usual optimality with respect to overall expected loss. Examples are presented, including discussion of a situation that arises in reliability demonstration.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 24
页数:24
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
BERNARDO JM, 1979, J R STAT SOC B, V41, P113
[2]   EXPECTED INFORMATION AS EXPECTED UTILITY [J].
BERNARDO, JM .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1979, 7 (03) :686-690
[3]   OPTIMAL BAYESIAN EXPERIMENTAL-DESIGN FOR LINEAR-MODELS [J].
CHALONER, K .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1984, 12 (01) :283-300
[4]  
CLEMEN RT, 1987, MANAGE SCI, V33, P373, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.33.3.373
[5]  
DEGROOT MH, 1988, ACCELERATED LIFE TES, P193
[6]  
DEGROOT MH, 1988, 433 CARN MELL U DEP
[7]   UPDATING OF BELIEF IN THE LIGHT OF SOMEONE ELSES OPINION [J].
FRENCH, S .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 1980, 143 :43-48
[8]  
French S., 1985, BAYESIAN STAT, V2, P183
[9]  
Genest C., 1986, STAT SCI, V1, P114, DOI DOI 10.1214/SS/1177013825
[10]   RECONCILIATION OF PROBABILITY-DISTRIBUTIONS [J].
LINDLEY, D .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1983, 31 (05) :866-880