The Unfairness of Risk-Based Possession Offences

被引:15
作者
Ashworth, Andrew [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Oxford, England
关键词
Possession offences; Firearms; Act requirement; Culpability requirement; Offences of omission; Principles of imputation; Abstract endangerment;
D O I
10.1007/s11572-011-9112-2
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This is a study of possession offences, with the focus on those intended to penalise the risk of a serious harm. Offences of this kind are examined in the light of basic doctrines of the criminal law, and in the light of the proper limits of endangerment offences. They are found wanting in both respects, and are also found to pose particular sentencing problems. The conclusion is that many risk-based possession offences are unfair, save those that require proof of a further intent or those aimed at a failure properly to safeguard a dangerous object.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 257
页数:21
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Alexander L, 2009, CAMB INTROD PHILOS L, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511804595
[2]  
American Law Institute, 1985, MOD PEN COD COMM, V1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, CRIMINAL JUSTICE ETH, V28, P168
[4]  
Ashworth A, 1996, CRIM LAW REV, P306
[5]  
Ashworth A., 2011, IRISH JURIS IN PRESS
[6]  
Ashworth A., 2011, OXFORD HDB PHILOS CR
[7]  
Ashworth A, 2006, INT J EVID PROOF, V10, P241
[8]   Ignorance of the Criminal Law, and Duties to Avoid it [J].
Ashworth, Andrew .
MODERN LAW REVIEW, 2011, 74 (01) :1-26
[9]   THE MORAL LIMITS OF CRIMINALIZING REMOTE HARMS [J].
Baker, Dennis J. .
NEW CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW, 2007, 10 (03) :370-391
[10]  
Blackstone, 2010, BLACKST CRIM PRACT 2