Scoring Divergent Thinking Tests by Computer With a Semantics-Based Algorithm

被引:60
作者
Beketayev, Kenes [1 ,2 ]
Runco, Mark A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Nazarbayev Univ, Astana, Kazakhstan
[2] Sparcit Inc, Davis, CA USA
[3] Amer Inst Behav Res & Technol, Vista, CA USA
关键词
Divergent thinking; assessing creativity; creativity test; flexibility; ideas; originality; semantic networks; associative networks; computer creativity; ideational fluency;
D O I
10.5964/ejop.v12i2.1127
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Divergent thinking (DT) tests are useful for the assessment of creative potentials. This article reports the semantics-based algorithmic (SBA) method for assessing DT. This algorithm is fully automated: Examinees receive DT questions on a computer or mobile device and their ideas are immediately compared with norms and semantic networks. This investigation compared the scores generated by the SBA method with the traditional methods of scoring DT (i.e., fluency, originality, and flexibility). Data were collected from 250 examinees using the "Many Uses Test" of DT. The most important finding involved the flexibility scores from both scoring methods. This was critical because semantic networks are based on conceptual structures, and thus a high SBA score should be highly correlated with the traditional flexibility score from DT tests. Results confirmed this correlation (r=.74). This supports the use of algorithmic scoring of DT. The nearly-immediate computation time required by SBA method may make it the method of choice, especially when it comes to moderate-and large-scale DT assessment investigations. Correlations between SBA scores and GPA were insignificant, providing evidence of the discriminant and construct validity of SBA scores. Limitations of the present study and directions for future research are offered.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 220
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Thinking in Multiple Directions: Hyperspace Categories in Divergent Thinking [J].
Acar, Selcuk ;
Runco, Mark A. .
PSYCHOLOGY OF AESTHETICS CREATIVITY AND THE ARTS, 2015, 9 (01) :41-53
[2]   Assessing Associative Distance Among Ideas Elicited by Tests of Divergent Thinking [J].
Acar, Selcuk ;
Runco, Mark A. .
CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2014, 26 (02) :229-238
[3]   In praise of convergent thinking [J].
Cropley, Arthur .
CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2006, 18 (03) :391-404
[4]  
FLACH F, 1990, CREATIVITY RES J, V3, P158, DOI DOI 10.1080/10400419009534349
[5]  
Guilford J. P., 1968, INTELLIGENCE CREATIV
[6]   Feasibility of online divergent thinking assessment [J].
Hass, Richard W. .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2015, 46 :85-93
[7]   COMPARISON OF STATISTICAL INFREQUENCY AND SUBJECTIVE JUDGMENT AS CRITERIA IN THE MEASUREMENT OF ORIGINALITY [J].
HOCEVAR, D .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1979, 43 (03) :297-299
[8]   EFFECTS OF SCORING FORMULAS ON THE DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY OF TESTS OF DIVERGENT THINKING [J].
HOCEVAR, D ;
MICHAEL, WB .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1979, 39 (04) :917-921
[9]  
Hocevar D., 1989, HDB CREATIVITY, P53, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-5356-1_3
[10]  
Kim K. H., 2005, J SECONDARY GIFTED E, V16, P57, DOI [DOI 10.4219/JSGE-2005-473, 10.4219/jsge-2005-473]