The fourth power: ICT and the role of the administrative state in protecting democracy

被引:12
作者
Bannister, Frank [1 ]
Connolly, Regina [2 ]
机构
[1] Trinity Coll Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Dublin City Univ, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
Democracy; e-democracy; the administrative state; bureaucracy; interoperability; integration;
D O I
10.3233/IP-180072
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Western liberal capitalist democracy is in trouble. In many democratic countries, for the first time since the second world war, nationalism, populism and the strong leader who can sort out the problems have re-emerged in force. Some democracies seem to be reverting to forms of autocracy which many thought they had left behind. ICT is a contributory factor to this trend. Contrary to the techno-optimism of the 1990s and early 2000s which forecast the emergence of more and stronger democracy underpinned by technological developments, technology increasingly appears as more of a threat to, rather than a support of, democracy. Technology-enabled problems include fake news, hacking of e-mail servers, hate sites, Twitter storms and filter bubbles into which different political groups retreat to reinforce their prejudices. This paper proposes a rethink of how technology can be deployed in defence of democracy and democratic values. We argue that it has long been recognised that the administrative state and its deep bureaucratic structures provide a degree of democratic resilience and that this resilience can be enhanced by appropriate use of ICT. We propose that prioritising ICT interoperability rather than ICT integration in public administration can enhance the separation of powers in the modern state and strengthen the ability of a polity to resist authoritarianism. This is not proposed as a solution to all of the problems facing contemporary democracy, but it can nonetheless contribute towards countering the increasingly negative impact of technology on politics. We argue that there is an urgent need to move beyond what has often been wishful thinking about e-government and e-democracy as transformative tools and consider how technology might be used for conserving and protecting the best of what we have already have.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 323
页数:17
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
Aday Sean, 2012, PEACEWORKS, V80, P1
[2]   Internet Voting in Comparative Perspective: The Case of Estonia [J].
Alvarez, R. Michael ;
Hall, Thad E. ;
Trechsel, Alexander H. .
PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS, 2009, 42 (03) :497-505
[3]  
Andrews C., 2015, BUREAUCRATIC FAILURE
[4]   Why e-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare.gov website [J].
Anthopoulos, Leonidas ;
Reddick, Christopher G. ;
Giannakidou, Irene ;
Mavridis, Nikolaos .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2016, 33 (01) :161-173
[5]   A risk assessment framework for electronic voting [J].
Bannister, Frank ;
Connolly, Regina .
International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 2007, 7 (02) :190-208
[6]  
Bannister F., 2005, Electronic Government, V2, P160, DOI 10.1504/EG.2005.007092
[7]   Dismantling the silos: extracting new value from IT investments in public administration [J].
Bannister, F .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2001, 11 (01) :65-84
[8]  
Bannister F., 2002, P EUR C EGOV, P49
[9]   The Trouble with Transparency: A Critical Review of Openness in e-Government [J].
Bannister, Frank ;
Connolly, Regina .
POLICY AND INTERNET, 2011, 3 (01)
[10]  
Bartels Larry M., 2016, UNEQUAL DEMOCRACY PO