Determining Velocity and Q-factor Structure using Crosshole Tomography

被引:0
|
作者
Fatkhan [1 ]
Nugraha, Andri Dian [2 ]
Syahputra, Ahmad [3 ]
机构
[1] Bandung Inst Technol, Appl Geophys Res Grp, Fac Min & Petr Engn, Jalan Ganesa 10, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
[2] Bandung Inst Technol, Global Geophys Res Grp, Fac Min & Petr Engn, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
[3] Bandung Inst Technol, Fac Min & Petr Engn, Geophys Engn, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
关键词
crosshole tomography; Q-factor; ray tracing; subsurface velocity; travel time tomography;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In this study, we have conducted a crosshole tomography survey to obtain seismic data from two boreholes on the ITB campus. The first borehole was 39 meters deep while the second was 19 meters deep. The aim of the study was to determine the subsurface velocity and Q-factor for the region between the two boreholes for geotechnical purposes. Sources of seismic waves were produced by an impulse generator and sparker and were recorded by 12 channels of borehole hydrophones. In the tomography inversion, the pseudo-bending ray tracing method was employed to calculate travel times. The initial velocity model was a 1-D model with 1x1 m(2) block dimensions. The non-linear inversion problem was solved by delay-time tomography with the LSQR method. Also, a checkerboard resolution test (CRT) was conducted to evaluate the resolution of the tomography inversion. Using the velocity structure results, a LSQR Q-tomography inversion was carried out using spectral curve fitting to obtain the attenuation structure (t* values). The resulting tomogram shows that there are 3 layers, with an unconsolidated layer (down to 8 meters), a consolidated layer (from 8 meters deep to 20 meters), and bedrock (more than 20 meters). From the results, the ground water level is estimated at a depth of 14 meters.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 38
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Windowless Q-factor tomography by the instantaneous frequency
    Vesnaver, A.
    Bohm, G.
    Cance, P.
    Dal Cin, M.
    Gei, D.
    GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2020, 68 (09) : 2611 - 2636
  • [2] Broadband Q-factor tomography for reservoir monitoring
    Vesnaver, Aldo
    Lin, Rongzhi
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 165 : 1 - 15
  • [3] Q-factor monitoring using asynchronous sampling
    Shake, I
    Takara, H
    Kawanishi, S
    OPTICAL TRANSMISSION, SWITCHING, AND SUBSYSTEM II, PTS 1 AND 2, 2005, 5625 : 194 - 201
  • [4] USING BMDP AND SPSS FOR A Q-FACTOR ANALYSIS
    TANNER, BA
    KONING, SM
    COMPUTER PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 1980, 12 (2-3): : 201 - 202
  • [5] Semicylindrical microresonator: excitation, modal structure, and Q-factor
    Haroyan, H.
    Parsamyan, H.
    Yezekyan, T.
    Nerkararyan, Kh.
    APPLIED OPTICS, 2018, 57 (22) : 6309 - 6313
  • [6] Determining the RF resistance and Q-FACTOR of air-core inductors
    Gross, S
    Weller, T
    MICROWAVE AND OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY LETTERS, 2001, 29 (02) : 89 - 93
  • [7] A PIEZOELECTRIC FILTER USING LOW Q-FACTOR INDUCTANCES
    YERGIYEV, GN
    IVANITSKY, AM
    IZVESTIYA VYSSHIKH UCHEBNYKH ZAVEDENII RADIOELEKTRONIKA, 1984, 27 (07): : 73 - 75
  • [8] Q-FACTOR OF MICROSTRIP RESONATORS
    KNOPPIK, N
    AEU-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATIONS, 1976, 30 (02) : 49 - 58
  • [9] Q-factor and velocity inversion from zero-offset VSP data
    Zhao, Jing
    Gao, Jinghuai
    Wang, Daxing
    Zhang, Mengli
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2014, 101 : 51 - 67
  • [10] THE Q-FACTOR OF A PIEZOCERAMIC RESONATOR
    MEZHERITSKIY, AV
    TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND RADIO ENGINEERING, 1987, 41-2 (12) : 68 - 71