A COMPARISON OF PRENATAL-CARE USE IN THE UNITED-STATES AND EUROPE

被引:50
作者
BUEKENS, P
KOTELCHUCK, M
BLONDEL, B
KRISTENSEN, FB
CHEN, JH
MASUYSTROOBANT, G
机构
[1] INSERM,EPIDEMIOL MOTHER & CHILD HLTH RES UNIT,F-94800 VILLEJUIF,FRANCE
[2] UNIV N CAROLINA,SCH PUBL HLTH,CHAPEL HILL,NC 27514
关键词
D O I
10.2105/AJPH.83.1.31
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives. We sought to describe prenatal care use in the United States and in three European countries where accessibility to prenatal care has been reported to be better than it is in the United States. Methods. We analyzed for 1980 US National Natality Survey, the 1981 French National Natality Survey, a 1979 sample of Danish births, and a survey performed from 1979 to 1980 in one Belgian province. Results. The proportion of women who began prenatal care late (after 15 weeks) is highest in the United States (21.2%) and lowest in France (4.0%). This contrasts with the median number of visits, which is greater in the United States (11) than in Denmark (10) or in France(7) Across all maternal ages, parities, and educational levels, late initiation of prenatal care is more frequent in the United States, and median number of visits in the United States is equal to or higher than that in the other countries. Conclusions. In countries that offer nearly universal access to prenatal care, women begin care earlier during pregnancy and have fewer visits than women in the United States.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 36
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
AZELMAT M, 1989, ENQUETE NATIONALE PL, P87
[2]   IMPACT OF THE FRENCH SYSTEM OF STATUTORY VISITS ON ANTENATAL CARE [J].
BLONDEL, B ;
SAURELCUBIZOLLES, MJ ;
KAMINSKI, M .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1982, 36 (03) :183-186
[3]   AN INDICATOR OF ADVERSE PREGNANCY OUTCOME IN FRANCE - NOT RECEIVING MATERNITY BENEFITS [J].
BLONDEL, B ;
SAURELCUBIZOLLES, MJ .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1991, 45 (03) :211-215
[4]   VARIATIONS IN PROVISION AND UPTAKE OF ANTENATAL CARE [J].
BUEKENS, P .
BAILLIERES CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1990, 4 (01) :187-205
[5]  
FINGERHUT LA, 1985, VITAL HLTH STAT 99, V2
[6]  
FORREST JD, 1987, HEALTH SERV RES, V22, P235
[7]  
Harrell F. E., 1986, SUGI SUPPLEMENTAL LI, P269
[8]  
*I MED, 1985, PREV LOW BIRTH
[9]  
KEPPEL KG, 1980, VITAL HLTH STAT 100, V2
[10]  
KRISTENSEN FB, 1987, THESIS I ALMEN MED S