THE CONSTITUTION AND THE PATRONAGE-MERIT DEBATE - IMPLICATIONS FOR PERSONNEL MANAGERS

被引:7
作者
ROBACK, TH
VINZANT, JC
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1177/009102609402300313
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This article examines the effect of recent Supreme Court rulings concerning the First Amendment freedom of association rights of public employees. The question is framed under the rubric of partisan patronage cases related to personnel selection, dismissal and other actions. The Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois case is highlighted in analyzing the key findings of the majority and minority opinions. Public managers are alerted to the practical implications of these judicial decisions so that legal challenges can be met. It is suggested that precision and clarity of job analysis, assessment methods, validity of interviewing and training in relevant understanding of constitutional decisions be implemented.
引用
收藏
页码:501 / 513
页数:13
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   THE EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEW - A SUMMARY AND REVIEW OF RECENT RESEARCH [J].
ARVEY, RD ;
CAMPION, JE .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 35 (02) :281-322
[2]  
DALEY D, PUBL PERS ADM PROBL, P20
[3]  
DANIEL C, 1992, REV PUBLIC PERSONNEL, P26
[4]  
FREEDMAN A, 1988, PUBLIC ADM REV SEP, P847
[5]  
HAMILTON DK, 1992, APR AM SOC PUBL ADM
[6]  
HEINEN SJ, 1991, HARVARD J LAW PUBLIC, V14, P292
[7]  
*IL COMM FUT PUBL, 1990, BEST BRIGHT PUBL SER
[8]  
MARTIN SL, AM U LAW REV, V39, P11
[9]  
NOWLAN JD, 1991, INSIDE STATE GOVT IL, P39
[10]  
Rosenbloom D. H., 1971, FEDERAL SERVICE CONS