HOW LARGE A SAMPLE IS NEEDED FOR THE MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATOR TO BE APPROXIMATELY GAUSSIAN

被引:53
作者
BRAUNSTEIN, SL
机构
[1] Dept. of Phys., Technion-Israel Inst. of Technol., Haifa
来源
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS A-MATHEMATICAL AND GENERAL | 1992年 / 25卷 / 13期
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0305-4470/25/13/027
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
This paper concerns the failure of the Gaussian approximation to the distribution of the maximum-likelihood estimator in one-parameter families for finite sample sizes. Fisher has shown that this approximation is valid when an asymptotically large sample of data points is used. He did this by treating the likelihood equation (i.e. the equation obtained by setting the derivative of the likelihood function with respect to the parameter to zero) statistically and finding its solution as the sample size n is taken to infinity. In this paper the statistical treatment of the likelihood equation is extended to include corrections for finite sample sizes. The O(1/n) corrections to Fisher's asymptotic Gaussian result are calculated with corrections to the central limit theorem, and are used to derive sufficient conditions on the sample size for Fisher's result to break down. Such conditions are useful for the design of experiments. The procedure developed here can be extended to the maximum-likelihood estimation of several parameters in multivariate distributions.
引用
收藏
页码:3813 / 3826
页数:14
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] BRAUNSTEIN SL, 1992, UNPUB PHYS REV LETT
  • [2] EFRON B, 1978, BIOMETRIKA, V65, P457, DOI 10.2307/2335893
  • [3] Feller W., 1971, INTRO PROBABILITY TH, V2, P525
  • [4] Theory of statistical estimation.
    Fisher, RA
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE CAMBRIDGE PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY, 1925, 22 : 700 - 725
  • [5] HINKLEY DV, 1991, STATISTICAL THEORY M, P287
  • [6] LANE AS, 1992, UNPUB PHYS REV A
  • [7] LEHMANN EL, 1983, THEORY POINT ESTIMAT, P415
  • [8] RAO CR, 1973, LINEAR STATISTICAL I
  • [9] ULTIMATE QUANTUM LIMITS ON PHASE MEASUREMENT
    SHAPIRO, JH
    SHEPARD, SR
    WONG, NC
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1989, 62 (20) : 2377 - 2380