Loteprednol etabonate gel 0.5% for postoperative pain and inflammation after cataract surgery: results of a multicenter trial

被引:29
作者
Fong, Raymond [1 ]
Leitritz, Martin [2 ]
Siou-Mermet, Raphaele [3 ]
Erb, Tara [4 ]
机构
[1] Lenox Hill Hosp, Manhattan Eye Ear & Throat Hosp, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Univ Tubingen, Univ Eye Hosp Tubingen, Dept Ophthalmol, Tubingen, Germany
[3] Bausch & Lomb, Montpellier, France
[4] Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY USA
来源
CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2012年 / 6卷
关键词
cataract surgery; corticosteroids; gel; loteprednol etabonate; postoperative inflammation; postoperative pain;
D O I
10.2147/OPTH.S32643
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: Loteprednol etabonate (LE) is approved by the US FDA in a suspension and ointment form (0.5%) for the treatment of postoperative ocular inflammation. This study examined the gel formulation of LE, an improved, nonsettling formulation with a lower preservative level and a more physiologic pH. Patients and methods: This multicenter, double-masked, parallel-group, vehicle-controlled study randomized patients agedm >= 18 years with postoperative anterior chamber cell (ACC) >= grade 2 following uncomplicated cataract surgery to either LE gel or vehicle four times a day for 14days. Primary efficacy end points included the proportion of patients with complete resolution of ACC and grade 0 (no) pain by postoperative day 8. Secondary efficacy end points included complete resolution and change from baseline in ACC and flare (individual and combined), and grade 0 pain at each visit. Safety end points included treatment-emergent adverse events, ocular symptoms, changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) and visual acuity, and biomicroscopy and funduscopy findings. Results: A total of 407 patients were randomized to treatment (n=206, LE gel; n=201, vehicle). At day 8, 31.1% (64) of LE-treated patients and 13.9% (28) of vehicle-treated patients had complete resolution of ACC (P > 0.001), and 75.7% (156) of LE-treated patients and 45.8% (92) of vehicle-treated patients had grade 0 pain (P < 0.001). Secondary efficacy end points also favored LE gel. Fewer patients treated with LE gel required rescue medication (10.7% versus 42.3%) prior to day 15, and fewer had an ocular adverse event (16.0% versus 28.9%, P= 0.002). No drug-related adverse effects were reported more than once in the LE group. Mean IOP decreased in both treatment groups; one patient in the LE group demonstrated a clinically significant increase (>= 10mm Hg) in IOP that was not considered drug-related. Visual acuity and funduscopy findings were similar between treatments . Conclusion: LE gel 0.5% was efficacious and safe in treating postoperative inflammation and pain in this clinical study.
引用
收藏
页码:1113 / 1124
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条