Participation under a spell of instrumentalization? Reflections on action research in an entrenched climate adaptation policy process

被引:24
作者
Boezeman, Daan [1 ]
Vink, Martinus [2 ]
Leroy, Pieter [3 ]
Halffman, Willem [4 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Management Res, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ & Res Ctr, Publ Adm & Policy Grp, Publ Adm, Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Nijmegen Sch Management, Inst Management Res, Polit Sci Environm, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Sci Innovat & Soc, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
participation; instrumentalization; science-policy interface; action research; climate adaptation; water management;
D O I
10.1080/19460171.2014.950304
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The article discusses action research in a Dutch intergovernmental project group DV2050. That group was to assess the effects of climate change and soil subsidence on the regional water system and to propose adaptive policies to increase regional water safety. In this study, we draw a parallel between the stakeholder participation trajectory of DV2050 and our collaborative learning trajectory within the DV2050 project. In the academic literature, both participatory policy-making and action research are advocated for instrumental, normative and quality reasons. In our case, both trajectories took place in an entrenched context, i.e. a strongly institutionalized environment in which the involved governments compete for competencies. Despite broader ambitions stated at the beginning of these trajectories, we explain that both became instrumentalized by actors involved, narrowing their scope. Instrumentalization was influenced by powerful interests, a strongly institutionalized science-policy interface and the pressure of imminent decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 426
页数:20
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Collaborative governance in theory and practice [J].
Ansell, Chris ;
Gash, Alison .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2008, 18 (04) :543-571
[2]   PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH AND ACTION SCIENCE COMPARED - A COMMENTARY [J].
ARGYRIS, C ;
SCHON, DA .
AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 1989, 32 (05) :612-623
[3]  
Argyris C., 2004, REASONS RATIONALIZAT
[4]   Symposium introduction: usable knowledge in practice. What action research has to offer to critical policy studies [J].
Bartels, Koen P. R. ;
Wittmayer, Julia Maria .
CRITICAL POLICY STUDIES, 2014, 8 (04) :397-406
[5]   The Dutch Delta Committee as a boundary organisation [J].
Boezeman, Daan ;
Vink, Martinus ;
Leroy, Pieter .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2013, 27 :162-171
[6]   In the shadow of legalism: understanding community participation in an overly bureaucratic context [J].
Bonetti, Marta ;
Villa, Matteo .
CRITICAL POLICY STUDIES, 2014, 8 (04) :447-464
[7]   The marathon of the hare and the tortoise: implementing the EU Water Framework Directive [J].
Bourblanc, Magalie ;
Crabbe, Ann ;
Liefferink, Duncan ;
Wiering, Mark .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 56 (10) :1449-1467
[8]   Reflexive Engagement? Actors, Learning, and Reflexivity in Public Dialogue on Science and Technology [J].
Chilvers, Jason .
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2013, 35 (03) :283-310
[9]   Managing stakeholder involvement in decision making: A comparative analysis of six interactive processes in the Netherlands [J].
Edelenbos, Jurian ;
Klijn, Erik-Hans .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2006, 16 (03) :417-446
[10]   There is nothing so theoretical as good action research [J].
Friedman, Victor J. ;
Rogers, Tim .
ACTION RESEARCH, 2009, 7 (01) :31-47