Mining and community relations: Mapping the internal dimensions of practice

被引:22
作者
Owen, John R. [1 ]
Kemp, Deanna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Ctr Social Responsibil Min, Sustainable Minerals Inst, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
来源
EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND SOCIETY-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL | 2014年 / 1卷 / 01期
关键词
Mining; Community; Development; Corporate social responsibility; Sustainable development; Organisation;
D O I
10.1016/j.exis.2013.12.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Imperatives for examining resource industry approaches to social performance continue to intensify. Mining companies claim to have embraced the key tenets of sustainable development (SD) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) and that social aspects are now 'core to business'. Evidence from the field suggests that despite these proclamations, the industry's mode of engagement and benefit distribution is not always defensible, or 'sustainable'. In this article, we use core-periphery thinking (CPT) as a foundation for mapping mineral resource relationships and internal decision making processes. The internal dimensions of social performance provide a productive platform for influencing and ultimately improving company-community relations in mining. The approach articulates four key dimensions by using a broader core-periphery construction as conceptual anchor points. These dimensions offer coordinates for understanding community relations practice within the organisational sphere. The purpose of building 'practice maps' is to offer scholars, practitioners and decision-makers a conceptual framework for social performance improvement that it is not bound by rigid notions of core and non-core aspects of mineral resource development. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 19
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Alvesson M., 2000, DOING CRITICAL MANAG
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, GETTING IT RIGHT MAK
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, STUDYING MANAGEMENT
[4]  
Bainton NA, 2010, ASIA-PAC ENV MONOGR, V5, P1
[5]   Resource wars: The anthropology of mining [J].
Ballard, C ;
Banks, G .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ANTHROPOLOGY, 2003, 32 :287-313
[6]  
Barrick Gold Corporation, 2013, COMMUNITY
[7]   Contention and Ambiguity: Mining and the Possibilities of Development [J].
Bebbington, Anthony ;
Hinojosa, Leonith ;
Bebbington, Denise Humphreys ;
Burneo, Maria Luisa ;
Warnaars, Ximena .
DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2008, 39 (06) :887-914
[8]  
Becker MC, 2008, HANDBOOK OF ORGANIZATIONAL ROUTINES, P3
[9]   Contested terrain: Mining and the environment [J].
Bridge, G .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2004, 29 :205-259
[10]  
Evans R., 2001, SME MINING ENG HDB, P1767