Social innovation and sustainability; how to disentangle the buzzword and its application in the field of agriculture and rural development

被引:127
作者
Bock, Bettina B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Hollandseweg 1, NL-6707 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
来源
STUDIES IN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS | 2012年 / 114卷 / 02期
关键词
social innovation; responsible innovation; critical innovation; rural development; sustainable agriculture; rural governance;
D O I
10.7896/j.1209
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Social innovation is often appointed as an essential part of agricultural and rural innovation. Everybody seems to agree that social innovation is important but what exactly is meant by the term remains often unclear. This paper aims at clarifying the meaning and significance of the concept by going back to its root in innovation science and policy. It appoints three main interpretations of social innovation, referring to the social mechanism of innovation, the social responsibility of innovation and the need for innovating society. Studying its application in the field of agriculture and rural development reveals that social innovation is rarely referred to when agriculture as a singular economic activity is concerned, but prominently present in discussions about rural development. Here social innovation may be referred to when identifying society's need for more sustainable production methods, the necessity for collaboration and social learning, and the scope of change needed for revitalising (rural) society. Often, however, social innovation is presented as a tangle of interdependent processes and beneficial outcomes. Its fuzziness contributes to its discursive power in discussions about agricultural politics and the significance of sustainability,but also hides the valued-loadedness of social innovation. As a result its critical potential becomes neutralised. For gaining more insight in how to more effectively support social innovation, it is important to disentangle the social innovation jumble, to unravel the diverse interrelations and to explore and monitor its functioning and contribution to processes of social change and renewal.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 63
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Social Acceptance of Dairy Farming: The Ambivalence Between the Two Faces of Modernity
    Boogaard, Birgit K.
    Bock, Bettina B.
    Oosting, Simon J.
    Wiskerke, Johannes S. C.
    van der Zijpp, Akke J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2011, 24 (03) : 259 - 282
  • [2] Bos A.P., 2012, FOOD PRACTICES TRANS, P229
  • [3] Knowledge in sustainable rural development: From forms of knowledge to knowledge processes
    Bruckmeier, Karl
    Tovey, Hilary
    [J]. SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2008, 48 (03) : 313 - 329
  • [4] The multidimensionality of environmental problems: The GMO controversy and the limits of scientific materialism
    Carolan, Michael S.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES, 2008, 17 (01) : 67 - 82
  • [5] Mainstreaming LEADER Delivery of the RDR in Cumbria: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis
    Convery, Ian
    Soane, Ian
    Dutson, Tom
    Shaw, Helen
    [J]. SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2010, 50 (04) : 370 - 391
  • [6] LEADER and innovation
    Dargan, Lorna
    Shucksmith, Mark
    [J]. SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2008, 48 (03) : 274 - 291
  • [7] Dockes A.-C., 2012, EU SCAR AGR KNOWLEDG, P23
  • [8] EC, 2010, COM20102020 EC, P2020
  • [9] Edquist C., 2001, DRUID C AALBORG 12 1
  • [10] The complexity of innovation: A relational turn
    Floysand, Arnt
    Jakobsen, Stig-Erik
    [J]. PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2011, 35 (03) : 328 - 344