RECENT ADVANCES IN THE USE OF DOPPLER WAVE-FORM INDEXES IN THE ANTENATAL ASSESSMENT OF INTRAUTERINE GROWTH-RETARDATION

被引:5
作者
CHANG, TC
CHENG, HH
机构
[1] Division of Fetal Maternal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Singapore General Hospital
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1479-828X.1994.tb01030.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Doppler ultrasound has been advocated as a useful tool to evaluate pregnancies with intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR). However, many previous studies have used smallness for gestational age (SGA) at birth to define IUGR. The ability of Doppler ultrasound to predict SGA, neonatal morphometric indices of wasting such as a low ponderal index, and perinatal morbidity is reviewed. Doppler assessment of the umbilical and uteroplacental vasculatures were inferior to ultrasound measurements of fetal size in the prediction of SGA. In low risk fetuses, umbilical artery waveform indices were of limited value in the prediction of neonatal morphometric indices of wasting. Within a group of high risk fetuses, Doppler assessment of the umbilical artery and, in particular, the middle cerebral and aortic vessels, were useful in predicting fetuses with neonatal wasting. Similar findings were noted in the prediction of perinatal morbidity. The review confirms the usefulness of umbilical artery Doppler waveform indices in the antenatal assessment of IUGR. Whilst preliminary studies appear to suggest that Doppler waveform indices of the middle cerebral and aortic vessels may confer an additional advantage in the antenatal assessment of IUGR, randomized controlled trials evaluating their effect on perinatal outcome and studies on the reproducibility of these indices need to be carried out before their widespread introduction into obstetric practice.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 13
页数:6
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
Dobson P, Abell A, Beischer N., Antenatal pregnancy complications and fetal growth complications, Aust NZ J Obstet Gynecol, 22, pp. 203-205, (1982)
[2]  
Steer RI., Intrapartum monitoring in 1UGR, Fetal growth. Proceedings of the 20th Study Group, pp. 381-387, (1989)
[3]  
Villar J, Belizan JM., The evaluation of the methods used in the diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation, Obstet Gynecol Surv, 41, pp. 187-199, (1986)
[4]  
Benson CB, Doubilet PM, Saltzman DH., Intrauterine growth retardation: Predictive value of ultrasound criteria for antenatal diagnosis, Radiology, 160, pp. 415-417, (1986)
[5]  
Patterson RM, Pouliot RN., Neonatal morphometries and perinatal outcome: Who is growth retarded, Am J Obstet Gvnecol, 157, pp. 691-693, (1987)
[6]  
Fay RA, Dey PL., Saadie CM, Buhl JA, Gebski VJ., Ponderal index: A better definition of the ‘at risk’ group with intrauterine problems than birth‐weight for gestational age in term infants, Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol, 31, pp. 17-19, (1991)
[7]  
Villar J, de Onis M, Kestier E, Bolanos F, Cerezo R, Bernedes H., The differential neonatal morbidity of the intrauterine growth retardation syndrome, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 163, pp. 151-157, (1990)
[8]  
Catalano PM, Tyzbir ED, Allen SR, McBean J.H., McAuIiffe TL., Evaluation of fetal growth by estimation of neonatal body composition, Obstet Gynecol, 79, pp. 46-50, (1992)
[9]  
Berkowitz GS, Chitkara U, Rosenberg J, Cogswell C, Berkowitz RL., Sonographic estimation of fetal weight and Doppler analysis of umbilical artery velocimetry in the prediction of intrauterine growth retardation: A prospective study, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 158, pp. 1149-1153, (1988)
[10]  
Rochelson BL, Schulman H, Fleischer A, Et al., The clinical significance of Doppler umbilical artery velocimetry in the small‐for‐gestational age fetus, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 156, pp. 1223-1226, (1987)