REGULATORY ASPECTS OF MODIFICATIONS TO INNOVATOR BRONCHODILATOR METERED-DOSE INHALERS AND DEVELOPMENT OF GENERIC SUBSTITUTES

被引:19
作者
ADAMS, WP
POOCHIKIAN, G
TAYLOR, AS
PATEL, RM
BURKE, GP
WILLIAMS, RL
机构
[1] Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Rockville
[2] Office of Drug Evaluation I, Division of Oncology and Pulmonary Drug Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Rockville
[3] Offices of Drug Evaluation I and II, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Rockville
来源
JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE-DEPOSITION CLEARANCE AND EFFECTS IN THE LUNG | 1994年 / 7卷 / 02期
关键词
REGULATORY REVIEW; METERED DOSE INHALERS; MDIS; INHALATION AEROSOLS; BETA-ADRENERGIC AGONISTS; REFORMULATION OF APPROVED PRODUCTS; SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS TESTING; CMC ISSUES; GENERIC PRODUCTS; IN-VITRO BIOEQUIVALENCE; IN-VIVO BIOEQUIVALENCE;
D O I
10.1089/jam.1994.7.119
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Regulatory requirements for modifications to an approved innovator metered dose inhaler (pressurized MDI; USP nomenclature: inhalation aerosol) and for development of a new generic product are discussed. Although many of the requirements apply generally to MDI's, they are discussed with specific reference to albuterol. Changes to the container and closure system may impact on the dosimetry of the redesigned product, as well as upon toxicologic and chemistry, manufacturing and controls (CMC) concerns. Changes to the formulation, including the use of alternate propellants, may raise issues requiring both clinical and in vitro performance evaluation. In view of the level of interest of a number of firms in approval requirements for generic Albuterol Inhalation Aerosol products, the article discusses in considerable detail the CMC and bioequivalence requirements for a generic product. Similarities in the CMC. requirements for innovator and generic products are evident. Three comparative in vitro bioequivalence tests, particle size distribution, spray pattern and plume geometry, and unit spray content, established by the Division of Bioequivalence are discussed. Similarities and differences in the in vivo requirements' for innovator and generic products are evident. Differences are the result of U.S. statute, which requires safety and efficacy testing for a product approved under a new drug application (NDA), but documentation of bioequivalence for a product approved under an abbreviated new drug application (ANDA). The advantages and disadvantages of three pharmacodynamic study designs which have potential usefulness for documentation of in vivo bioequivalence are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 134
页数:16
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
ADAMS W.P., Guidance for the in vitro portion of bioequivalence requirements for metaproterenol sulfate and albuterol inhalation aerosols (metered dose inhalers), (1989)
[2]  
ADAMS W.P., Bioequivalence issues in aerosol drug development, (1991)
[3]  
The production and quality control of metered dose inhalers (MDIs), Pharm. Forum., 11, pp. 934-940, (1985)
[4]  
AHRENS R.C., BONHAM A.C., MAXWELL G.A., WEINBERGER M.M., A method for comparing the peak intensity and duration of action of aerosolized bronchodilators using bronchoprovocation with methacholine, Am. Rev. Respir. Dis., 129, pp. 903-906, (1984)
[5]  
AHRENS R.C., HARRIS J.B., MILAVETZ G., ANNIS L., RIES R., Use of bronchial provocation with histamine to compare the pharmacodynamics of inhaled albuterol and metaproterenol in patients with asthma, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 79, pp. 876-882, (1987)
[6]  
BARNES P.J., PRIDE N.B., Dose-response curves to inhaled 0-adrenoceptor agonists in normal and asthmatic subjects, Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol., 15, pp. 677-682, (1983)
[7]  
BLAKE K.V., HOPPE M., HARMAN E., HENDELES L., Relative amount of albuterol delivered to lung receptors from a metered-dose inhaler and nebulizer solution
[8]  
bioassay by histamine bronchoprovocation, Chest., 101, pp. 309-315, (1992)
[9]  
Salbutamol monograph, 1, pp. 496-497, (1988)
[10]  
Pressurized inhalations: Deposition of the emitted dose, 2, pp. A204-A207, (1988)