Usefulness of Early Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Colic Patients with Ureteral Stones

被引:11
作者
Choi, Hyeung Joon [1 ]
Jung, Jin-Hee [2 ]
Bae, Jungbum [1 ]
Cho, Min Chul [1 ]
Lee, Hae Won [1 ]
Lee, Kwang Soo [1 ]
机构
[1] Dongguk Univ, Ilsan Hosp, Dept Urol, 27 Dongguk Ro, Goyang 410773, South Korea
[2] Dongguk Univ, Ilsan Hosp, Dept Radiol, Goyang, South Korea
关键词
Colic; Lithotripsy; Ureteral calculi;
D O I
10.4111/kju.2012.53.12.853
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare efficacy and safety between early extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (eESWL) and deferred ESWL (dESWL) in colic patients with ureteral stones and to investigate whether eESWL can play a critical role in improving treatment outcomes. Materials and Methods: A total of 279 patients who underwent ESWL for single radio- opaque ureteral stones of 5 to 20 mm in size were included in this retrospective study. The patients were categorized into two groups according to the time between the onset of colic and ESWL: eESWL (<48 hours, n=153) and dESWL (>= 48 hours, n=126). Success was defined as stone-free status as shown on a plain radiograph within 1 month of the first session. Results: For all patients, the success rate in the eESWL group was significantly higher than that in the dESWL group. The eESWL group required significantly fewer ESWL sessions and less time to achieve stone-free status than did the dESWL group. For 241 patients with stones <10 mm, all treatment outcomes in the former group were superior to those in the latter group, but not for 38 patients with stones sized 10 to 20 mm. The superiority of eESWL over dESWL in the treatment outcomes was more pronounced for proximal ureteral stones than for mid-to-distal ureteral stones. Post-ESWL complication rates were comparable between the two groups. In the multivariate analysis, smaller stone size and a time to ESWL of <48 hours were independent predictors of success. Conclusions: Our data suggest that eESWL in colic patients with ureteral stones is an effective and safe treatment with accelerated stone clearance.
引用
收藏
页码:853 / 859
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   The soft-tissue rim sign [J].
Al-Nakshabandi, NA .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 229 (01) :239-240
[2]   Prediction of spontaneous ureteral calculous passage by an artificial neural network [J].
Cummings, JM ;
Boullier, JA ;
Izenberg, SD ;
Kitchens, DM ;
Kothandapani, RV .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (02) :326-328
[3]   Emergency shock wave lithotripsy for ureteric stones [J].
Dasgupta, Ranan ;
Hegarty, Nicholas ;
Thomas, Kay .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2009, 19 (02) :196-199
[4]   Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J].
Dindo, D ;
Demartines, N ;
Clavien, PA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :205-213
[5]   Evaluation of Emergency Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Obstructing Ureteral Stones [J].
Ghalayini, Ibrahim F. ;
Al-Ghazo, Mohammed A. ;
Khader, Yousef S. .
INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2008, 34 (04) :433-440
[6]   AN EXPERIMENTAL MODEL OF URETERAL COLIC [J].
KIM, HL ;
LABAY, PC ;
BOYARSKY, S ;
GLENN, JF .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1970, 104 (03) :390-&
[7]   Emergency extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for acute renal colic caused by upper urinary-tract stones [J].
Kravchick, S ;
Bunkin, I ;
Stepnov, E ;
Peled, R ;
Agulansky, L ;
Cytron, S .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2005, 19 (01) :1-4
[8]   A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Early (&lt;48 Hours of Onset of Colicky Pain) Versus Delayed Shockwave Lithotripsy for Symptomatic Upper Ureteral Calculi: A Single Center Experience [J].
Kumar, Anup ;
Mohanty, Nayan K. ;
Jain, Manoj ;
Prakash, Sanjay ;
Arora, Rajender P. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 (12) :2059-2066
[9]   EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY OF URETERAL STONES - CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE AND EXPERIMENTAL FINDINGS [J].
MUELLER, SC ;
WILBERT, D ;
THUEROFF, JW ;
ALKEN, P .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1986, 135 (04) :831-834
[10]   Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography [J].
Pareek, G ;
Hedican, SP ;
Lee, FT ;
Nakada, SY .
UROLOGY, 2005, 66 (05) :941-944